Who wins. And who loses

I honestly don't know what to say about it after reading this publication: An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5 I'm going to try to be very even-handed without trying to get into any discussions that might lead to misunderstandings.

Again more questions come up and one of the most important is what will happen with this new centralization, who will lose and who will win.

Those of us who are classified as small fish, who are working hard every day to make this platform a better place, how it can affect us, I know that my questions are not encouraging but I will remain optimistic.

After reading the entire publication mentioned Link I will cite some sentences:

• The Steem blockchain will not be abandoned or merged to TRON unless the community decides so.

Ok, it sounds great, but now they have the majority of the witnesses in their favor, this means they can decide the merger, I hope I'm not wrong.

However I must clarify that I am very satisfied with many arguments that are plated there may seem contradictory regarding my own questions.

Definitely hostile behavior does not generate trust anywhere, in my country we have 20 years of hostile behavior and I can say with much property that this type of behavior is never good for any society and much less for this platform, where we are millions of people building something that will always be in the blockchain.

---

• Steemit.com User experience improvements

Creating improvements in the user experience is what we seek every day, somehow existing users create commitment and create interaction with other users, that generates improvements.

Each time new users are incorporated, this incorporation must be welcomed and focus our commitment so that they, the new users, are hooked to this ocean of opportunities in our ecosystem. It's not much to ask for support.

• Contributing to the quality and authenticity of the user base by implementing an invite / referral signup system.

I am not particularly sure about this .. many times friends ask me that if it is by reference they prefer not to enter, they associate this type of entry with PONZI Scheme, but hey, I will definitely just have to wait to see what happens.

• Enhancing the quality of user experience on Steemit.com by removing ads, optimizing the front page, making the rewards system easy to use through browser extensions, and integrating the wallet with the main site.
  Enhancing the mobile experience.

With this sentence I totally agree, , I know that many share my opinion definitely many times we need the reward system to be easy for everyone without exception.

---

• A social network without content won’t go far. Steemit.com has a perfect foundation and we will reward more to the content creators and/or curators to feed the users.

By belonging to the @project.hope community that is growing due to its commitment values in supporting good content, we are creating a multifactor community where content creators are from different countries but we share similar interests in some issues. I hope that somehow it is true and they begin to support communities like this.

I can not make any kind of conclusion, they are just putting on the table what is written and want to execute for the good of all, so I just have to be optimistic and continue betting on my future and the future of many who are here.

I'm optimistic.

What do you think. I would like to know your opinion.

PROJECT #HOPE An Initiative to give hope!

@crypto.piotr, @project.hope, @cyberspacegod, @achim03, @lanzjoseg, @fucho80, @neavvy, @juanmolina, @jadams2k18, @machnbirdsparo, @honarparvar, @guruvaj, @alokkumar121, @edgarare1, @flash07, @djennyfloro, @gandhibaba, @reverseacid, @yonnathang, @mariusfebruary.