Also

The Korean proxy also voted with this strategy in mind. Even aggroed said that this was a good compromise. Here is one of his tweets:

aggroed was 100% wrong about anything being a good compromise and that was clear at the time.

The SCT/proxy.token (not all Koreans) "strategy" was to make ransom demands because they wanted to milk Steem harder but couldn't do that with their minority stake. They played a stupid game that resulted in Hive splitting from Steem. And then they complain they didn't get any airdrop to Hive when they got exactly what they wanted. Greedy idiots.

Edit:

After three days, @cmp2020 has not followed up with this post or any replies to him. continues to post and comment on Steem, has not acknowledged that his "strategy" was faulty,

and on top of all that

On Steem, this father-son power duo are voting for @steemchiller and @exnihilo.witness who are both running 0.22.8888, active participants in fucking over legitimate Steem stakeholders that added incalculable value to Steem. Way more than those bottom-feeding, scavenger sham witnesses leeching from the corpse of Steem ever will. https://steemd.com/@remlaps

No

You're not much different from the SCT crowd who voted as a "strategy." The Hive airdrop exclusion was made exactly for this kind of stakeholder. You will not get my vote. Voting for those witnesses on Steem, you have earned my active participation in campaigning against such a bad idea. Your irresponsible voting and actions have consequences here.