I never promised to do an in-depth review, or highlight any of your "positive" points.
If you want a more in-depth review, I can write a new article, title it "XeniaCoin ICO review" and it will be more thorough.
The excuse of "oh, we're busy developing and don't have time to correct these problems" is not only a poor excuse, but only further demonstrates your failure to address critical mistakes.
You DO need to focus on these glaring issues, the fact you've begun an ICO with almost 30 team members but none of them have said "hey guys, wait a second, we have typos everywhere, our Linkedin's suck, and should the website say this?"
It's up to you to earn the trust of the audience. I am EXTREMELY critical of my own projects. It's necessary to show that you are legitimate and you care.
My review was unbiased, I have never met any of you prior to this and don't harbor any ill-will against anyone, but you totally look, by almost every metric one would evaluate, to be illegitimate, or at the very least, a failure not addressing the most basic necessities of any project in the token-sale phase. Your website and whitepapers aren't even a good first draft, and you are clearly ignoring some legalities you really shouldnt.
Your whitepaper has many sections that are a word-for-word copy of another.
And the more I think about it, the less convinced I am you are real because how could anyone think the mistakes you made are okay and continue with a token sale? It shows you aren't serious enough to be trusted in my opinion, and surely that of anyone who critically reviews your project. Which may be why I don't see it reviewed by any experts yet, becasue it would fail miserably.
BUT, since you did at least copy and paste all the "limits of liability" and disclaimer words, you could be a real, registered company, open up a token sale, take everyone's money, and deliver nothing and keep all the money as the legal verbage says you owe your investors absolutely nothing and make no guarantees.
AND if you are fine with having such a poorly put together website, whitepaper, tokensale, unprofessional team, etc. Then it is more likely you will fail to deliver than not.
If you want me to do a review, you probably won't like the result.. Your "positive points" or your mission statement mean NOTHING if you don't address the most basic necessities of running a legit project by all standards. It would be a short paragraph followed by pages and pages of glaring mistakes no project should ever attempt a public sale before correcting.
Still waiting on that picture of your HQ I was told we'd receive.
RE: 🚨Is XEN XeniaCoin a scam? 🚨