The COVID-19 pandemic not only brought about a health crisis but also unveiled a covert operation involving the weaponization of psychology and propaganda. This article delves into the intricate mechanisms of three primary weapons employed during the COVID operation: confusion, group pressure, and fear-based tactics.
Psychological Weapon #1: Confusion
Confusion emerged as a potent psychological weapon during the COVID operation. Utilized by those in power, confusion was strategically disseminated among the public to manipulate perceptions and control behavior. Dr. Joost Meerloo’s insights on confusion as a tool for effective mind control shed light on its profound impact. By inducing a state of cognitive disarray, individuals were rendered vulnerable, leading them to relinquish personal authority and decision-making to external entities. The example of contradictory regulations and guidelines imposed during the pandemic illustrates how confusion was systematically engineered. Instances such as contradictory mask mandates and inconsistent business regulations served to destabilize public trust and foster dependence on external directives.
The first psychological weapon used against the public during COVID was confusion.
“Confusing a targeted audience is one of the necessary ingredients for effective mind control. This is from Dr. Joost Meerloo, a behavioral modification expert. Confusion sets the subconscious into believing it lacks clarity, believing itself unable to make logical decisions. Therefore, our neurological system finds it safer to outsource personal authority and decision-making to external third parties when confused.
As you can see in this diagram, destructive interference, where opposing beliefs can cancel each other out energetically, causing a flat line and a secession of thought. That means if you're in the ruling group and you can confuse the group you're ruling, you can stop them from thinking and you will be able to manhandle them psychologically at will.
Examples of confusion launched at the public during COVID
Gym’s were closed during declared health emergencies, yet liquor stores, fast food restaurants, weed shops in Canada, and junk food corner stores were open for business.
You weren't permitted to bring your own grocery bags from home to the grocery store, yet you were permitted to wear your clothes to the grocery store, which also came from your home.
You had to enter a restaurant standing, wearing a mask, yet when you sat down, you could take the same mask off and then put it back on when using the toilet.
Doug Ford's medical advisor, Dr. Yaffe, in Ontario, Canada, declared that testing teachers daily for COVID wasn't being done because the tests are unreliable 50% or more of the time. Yet, the same testing was deemed mandatory and essential by the same government for many other sectors.
Were you confused? Of course, you were, because that was the design intent.
Dr. Fauci, probably at the beginning of the pandemic, said no masks were necessary, then one mask, ten, then none if you complied, then all back on regardless of your vaccine status, then magically masks did not matter.
Big Box stores all open, local businesses closed. Vaccines were declared safe and effective, but better vaccine makers insisted that they hold no legal liability for death or injury from those "safe and effective" vaccines.
News anchors use key phrases like "trust the science". However, "trust the science" was never displayed, and anyone asking to verify the science was attacked and told they were anti-science.
Pfizer even petitioned the US government to hide their vaccine safety data for 75 years. Nothing says "safe and effective" more than hiding your own safety data for more than seven decades.
If someone died or was injured within 14 days of taking any Covid injection, that injury was listed as occurring in the unvaccinated. Although data indicated that the vast majority of deaths and permanent injuries occurred within 72 hours of the COVID injection, and that would be deaths and injuries in the unvaccinated.
Some strip joints were providing free lap dances if patrons submitted to the COVID jab, while churches were forced to close. Curfews and group restrictions were frequent because, of course, the virus can now count, attacking you in a group of 11 but not in a group of 9. It also wears a watch, attacking at 10:01 p.m. in the curfew zone but not at 9:59.
Elected officials refer to non-elected experts, bypassing the very foundation of a democracy. Were you confused? Of course, you were; that was the design intent.We regressing into taxation without representation. Experts, were unwilling to discuss and debate what they claim expertise in.Many doctors, judges, police, military, lawyers, and pharmacist violated thier patient citizen protection oaths because of large payouts to do so.
Multi-gender programming erupted, plus men started to dominate female sports and Female safe areas. When you go to weaponize confusion against the public, you pilot high and wide.
Vows made to protect Grandma, were widespread, as grandmother was being mistreated, disrespected, and abused, and even medically euthanised.
Measures said to protect lives obviously destroyed lives, communities, and our collective humanity.
Local businesses in Ontario, Canada, were eventually made bankrupt, closed via the “reopening Ontario Act”, a very clever use of Orwellian double-speak, an aerosolised viral pathogen that could take people down at will like a well assassin. Could only be tested by driving a swab deep into the nasal cavity. If the extremely dangerous pathogen floats in the air, why can't we breathe on the swab? Well, that's because confusing a targeted audience is one of the necessary ingredients for effective mind control.”
Psychological Weapon #2: Group Pressure
Leveraging Social Dynamics for Control: Group pressure emerged as another potent psychological weapon wielded during the COVID operation. Drawing from Edward Bernays' theories on manipulating the group mind, authorities capitalized on innate human tendencies to conform and seek safety within the larger group. Through speeches and propaganda campaigns, leaders instilled a sense of collective responsibility and ostracized dissenting voices as outliers. Justin Trudeau's "small fringe" minority speech exemplifies the manipulation of group dynamics to marginalize opposing viewpoints. By aligning with the perceived majority and demonizing dissenters, authorities sought to quell resistance and solidify control over public opinion.
Psychological Weapon #3: Fear
Orchestrating Psychological Warfare: Fear-based tactics played a central role in the weaponization of psychology during the COVID operation. Employing fear as a tool for social control, authorities utilized media narratives and public health messaging to instill a pervasive sense of dread and apprehension. By amplifying the perceived threat posed by the virus and exaggerating potential consequences, individuals were coerced into compliance with government mandates and restrictions. The example of constant updates on case numbers and dire predictions of future outcomes contributed to a climate of fear and uncertainty. Additionally, the manipulation of information regarding vaccine safety and efficacy further exacerbated fear and distrust among the populace.
The weaponization of psychology and propaganda during the COVID operation represents a sinister manipulation of human psychology for political and social control. Through tactics such as confusion, group pressure, and fear-based propaganda, authorities exploited vulnerabilities in the human psyche to achieve their objectives. By understanding these mechanisms, individuals can guard against manipulation and strive for a society built on transparency, critical thinking, and ethical leadership. Only through awareness and resistance can we safeguard against future attempts to manipulate public perception and undermine democratic principles.
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, a growing discourse has emerged, shedding light on the intricate web of psychological manipulation surrounding the pandemic response.
This examination delves into the parallels between historical methods of manipulation and the tactics employed by authorities during the COVID-19 crisis. It challenges individuals to question the narratives they are fed and to unravel the motives behind them.
Central to this discourse is the concept of self-validation, introduced through COVID Facts Self-Validating Fact Sheets. These sheets encourage individuals to validate COVID information based on their own experiences, facilitating non-confrontational sharing of information.
Moreover, a Novel Approach to Pandemic Management is explored, contrasting established pandemic procedures with the handling of COVID-19 by authorities. This prompts reflection on the disparities and encourages critical analysis of the pandemic response.
Additionally, attention is drawn to the Calculated Mismanagement of COVID Care, highlighting the mismanagement of public health and patient care. This includes the redefinition of terms and exaggeration of numbers to instill fear.
Furthermore, Crazy COVID Orders & Chinese Coercion Techniques are scrutinized, drawing parallels between COVID orders and brainwashing techniques. This suggests a coordinated effort reminiscent of historical coercion methods.
In addition, Call it Murder questions the actions of authorities regarding COVID-19, citing criminal negligence, culpable homicide, and potential crimes against humanity.
Moreover, When Healthcare Looks Like Genocide accuses government COVID policies of causing unnecessary deaths and violating the Nuremberg Code through coerced medical experiments.
Furthermore, Nuremberg - What Was Your Experience Like? raises concerns about the voluntary and informed consent of individuals in relation to the COVID vaccine, invoking the principles of the Nuremberg Code.
Additionally, Never Again - Happening Now Nuremberg compares the principles of the Nuremberg Code to the experience of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, highlighting potential violations.
Lastly, Do You Recognize Discrimination When You See It? draws parallels between historical discrimination and current COVID-related mandates, warning against repeating past mistakes.
Overall, the presentation aims to encourage critical thinking and awareness of potential manipulation and coercion during the COVID-19 pandemic. It challenges individuals to question authority, scrutinize information, and advocate for their rights in the face of adversity.