Source
People love fantasy. The Katakhotta world of materialism does not properly entertain or attract him. As a result, people of Ekshaini try to create an alternative explanation of various types of events, theories, or enjoying support and confidence in such activities. In this way conspiracy theories on various issues are introduced. Social or political factors are involved in their founding. The world's most popular conspiracy has been built in the moon, with people coming out. Manu Chandra Vision is totally blasphemy to the people of Ekashreni and it is not only they believe but it also brings lots of arguments in favor of this. However, many of these logic argues that there is a lot of spacers and that is why they are known as conspiracy theories. But NASA has prepared for a long time to send people to the moon, a large number of people have worked to make these missions successful. There is so much logic that people have not been able to lunge in the moon, so to write those details a book will be made. So here are some of the only significant ones which are widely circulated and a part of the general public, which are curious about the topic. Those who want to know more about this topic can read this Wikipedia article.
Conspiracy-1:
People who believe in the conspiracy did not put the feet on the moon, they presented such images of Chandravyan as a reason for their belief. There are no stars in the black sky in the picture (the first picture below). Their comment is that since the moon does not have the atmosphere, the sunlight can not make the stars disappear, scattered in the atmosphere of the moon. In that case, there was a star of stars in the background.
Source
But see the second image, it is a picture of the Earth surface taken from the International Space Station (ISS), which revolves around the Earth. According to the same logic, there is no star in the background to be present in the background. If you have any doubt about this second image, you will see ISS live video broadcast from this link, there are no stars in there too.
Pictures of earthquakes taken from International Space Station, behind the black background.
Exposure is the reason why they are not seen in the background. During the photo shoot, the amount of light is controlled by reducing or increasing the exposure of the lens (originally done through shutter speeds). If the exposure is high, then too much light source will be caught in the picture. The brightness of the stars in the daytime is more extreme than the moon and the surface of the earth. If these exposures were extended to these images, they might have been visible, but in that case the moon and the earth were white due to excess exposure and many features of their surface could not be found in the film. And the subject of these pictures is the moon and earth's surface, and not the black sky in the background, so the exposure of the camera has been kept so that the characteristics of their surface are clear in the picture. The picture below shows how to reduce the exposure to photographs of relatively low light sources, and in that case the sources of bright light are exposed to white.
Conspiracy-2:
Many people think that although the moon does not have air on the ground, the flag that has been placed on the moon shows that the flag is flying. From here they decided that it was originally built in the desert of Arizona!
Explanation:
Notice the picture below, slightly better, is the flag really flying?
Salute to the lightning aladrn flag
The position of the flag remains the same even after the salute is brought down.
One side of the flag is also attached to the upper part of the frame, but also connected to a tubular aluminum frame. There is no reason to understand that it is not clear from this picture. And since the bottom part is curved, it seems from a distance that the flag is flying, it has been applied to create a visual illusion. And see the differences between two pictures. Buzz Aldrin saluted the flag in the first film. Holding his right hand in the saluted condition, you can see two fingers on the right hand, on the helmet. In the second film the hand came down, but in the two films the flag flying is exactly the same. If the flag was flying in the air, would the interval of a few seconds be exactly the same curly?
Conspiracy-3:
"Eagle Moon-Lander and the shadow produced by stone are different. Does the moon light two suns? "
Explanation:
The shadow of different objects of the same source depends on many things and depending on them, the shadow direction may look slightly different. Among these, the viewer (camera in this case), the shadow retaining surface, the widen of the camera lens etc.
Seeing the shadow on the moon, the eagle moon, and the shadow of some objects in the moonlight, the light source looks different.
The shadows are being tested by creating a model like the moonlight in the workshop.
Take the first picture on the surface of the moon. Conspiracy questions about the source of light in the picture. According to the various features of this photo, the second set of pictures has been made in the workshops. In addition to the properties of the Moon, as well as a marker in it, it has been kept in mind. From the shadow of this marker and toy Munlader, it is clear that the shadows of these two are being created from the same source. But the middle of the shadow of the objects seems to have different sources of light. But these objects are located on the surface of a friend, the way the shadow is read. The same thing is also true for the moon surface. If the shade of the middle objects were on the same plane of other objects, their shadows would have been produced at roughly the same direction. Another conspiracy from this picture is that the Astronaut is in the shadows as it is in the shadow, that's why it is dark. But the conspiracy also got split from the second picture. The amount of light that will be reflected in the moon surface from the light source will make enough brightness in Astron's white attire. If the matter is still unclear to anyone, then he can take a look at the video of the fable, where the platonic evidence of this conspiracy theory has been proved through examination.
Conspiracy-4:
"If the people have lived three and a half decades before the moon, why can not it go now? This means that people have never gone to the moon. "
Explanation:
This is a very lame question. According to this question, if I went to Cox's Bazar for a short while and if I did not go bigger then it is proved that I have never visited Cox's Bazar!
Moon expedition is quite costly. Nasa had employed four lakh people to work on the moon mission. People have been campaigning for six times in the moon and it is no longer existing under the project. Even the Apollo project was supposed to run three more drives (Apollo-18-20), but due to the absence of major requirements, the funds were used for other purposes. People who were required to do research on the Moon were required to do research on the Moon, and enough samples of moon rock were collected. If you go to the moon again, the whole process will have to start from the beginning again, to convince the governor to funding, and to be honest, sending people to the moon is not very important. When the first step was to take the moon, there was competition with space with Russia, even the government did not have the money to pay the money in both hands, now there is nothing like that.
People who think that in the last three and a half decades technologically advanced people have now become more easy to man-made moonlight, so there is no reason to send people to the moon now. But the result of technological advancement is actually the opposite. Technological excellence reduces human needs instead. At one time the man needed to send the job, but now people do not have to do that work. As much as the people are getting the technological capabilities, they are thinking of doing the risky tasks through robots instead of humans. Thinking about how the robot can be used to rescue the affected areas. It is assumed that people will not fight directly in the future, but rather send robots for war.
Therefore, people will be sent to the Moon at the present time, waste of time, money, energy and capacity. The capabilities that people have already proved that there is no need to prove new to the conspirators, rather it is necessary to increase this capability and try to achieve something even more rare. Space researcher agencies are doing the same thing. They are thinking of sending people to Mars in the next few years and the research that is required to do this is doing the same.