I read this post by ClearMiddle: https://clearmiddle.substack.com/p/sin-problem – feel free to peruse the article. You will see the following exchange in the comments. (I corrected a few things I mistyped but left ClearMiddle’s text as is. There may be more when You get there, presuming You go, but as of this writing, this is it.
My initial comment:
Having been raised with no religion – lots of love and Ethics, but no religion – the word "sin" has interested Me greatly. As I studied many religions, seeing gems of truth in mountains of dogma in them all, it occurred to Me that "sin" is the breaking of the three Laws of Ethics, those Laws that are the foundation of common law. We would have virtually no social problems if We all kept those Laws.
Of course, money motivates the breaking of them all the time...
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
I do not judge Others based on anything but whether They choose Their behavior Ethically or not. Lineage, religion, affiliation are irrelevant to Me, as long as One chooses Ethical behavior. I may not like Their personality and avoid Them, but as long as They're not breaking the Laws, I will not attack Them.
To which ClearMiddle responded:
I seem to be severely overloaded at the moment, but I'll offer a question and some remarks. Where do natural laws originate? (Understanding that I have not yet taken a close look at your blog, just an overview.)
I have also studied a range of religions, not a broad range but inclusive of the major ones. I see what appears to be much effort by humanity to improve itself, and we sure need improving. I don't see that these efforts have been effective.
I see instead a natural law operating where things always corrupt, degrading from higher order to lower order over time, unavoidably. In this view, higher order is possible, but it must be introduced from outside our own existence.
To which I offered:
Natural Law is derived from what no One would say would be okay to be done to Themselves.
Those three Laws define the things that if You asked anyOne if They would be okay having them done to Them, to a One They will say "No!" Given this, We can say they are universal, Natural Law.
I have looked long and hard for anything that does not fall into these categories that All will say "no" to. Everything else, it would seem, is a matter of taste.
And I suggest that Humanity is not in need of changes within. Having been homeless for 20 years, at the mercy of Others, I can say with surety that Most want to help. They care. And They do what They can. But money stands in the way, most of the time. They cannot afford much or anything at all.
We need to remove the system that promotes primary (genetic) psychopaths to power, which has two components, either of which alone will promote Them and combined is devastating. The first is money systems. In the few societies that emerged in abundance, where all They needed was there for the taking, no money arose.
The caring Ones took care of things, the People were happy, loving, playful, giving, creative, and doing things They loved to do for the social currencies – the thanks, appreciation, reciprocation, honor, lauds, fame, love, and such that They received. When problems arose, They moved to solve them the best way, not the cheapest or most profitable – or left to fester because there was no money.
And the psychopaths learned to choose Their behavior Ethically or be cast out (or killed).
These societies fell when the "western world" came in, usurped Their land and forced energy accounting practices on Them.
Our society emerged from scarcity, where all hands were needed to get needed things done. And thus We began accounting for the energy We each add into the community/system to ensure no "skaters" – Ones who took but did not give. First We accounted for the energy in trade/barter, and when that became problematic, representational things. Today, though We have abundance, money motives create artificial scarcity, and keep the psychopaths at the top – for psychopaths lust after power over Others, and so will do literally anything, Ethical or unEthical, to get and keep the most.
And the psychopaths maintain the accounting for Our energy added. They hide and suppress all technologies offering free energy, because free energy makes accounting for Our energy pointless. And the tool that accounts for it is the only tool to power They have – it buys all the rest They use, the things and the People.
Once We have free energy flowing, it will be about 10 years before money is gone...
The second psychopath-promoting institution is the legal/governmental system. It too offers power over Others and so the psychopaths will be drawn to it. I do not consent to it, standing sovereign under the three Laws of Ethics. And I aim for enough of Us doing the same such that that system falls to the wayside.
Without those systems that promote the primary psychopaths to power over Us, secondary (conditioned) psychopathy will not emerge. In societies run by primary psychopaths, People learn to shut off Their caring, compassion, love, and empathy for Others so as to "succeed," survive, and/or cope. And thus We see the mess We see today, which might lead One to think that Humanity is just psychopathic.
In nature, We surely are not.
And then I offered this link (given here on the platform You’re reading this on)”
Why Does Money Promote Psychopaths? (article): @amaterasusolar/why-does-money-promote-psychopaths
If what I offered here clarifies the goals I aim for, please let Me know, and if it does not, please ask questions. There are more links below.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to info:
Blueprint for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns (article): @amaterasusolar/blueprint-for-a-society-of-ethical-sovereigns
Solutocracy – A Way to Govern (article): @amaterasusolar/solutocracy-a-way-to-govern
The Third Option: Anarcho-Abundancism (article): @amaterasusolar/the-third-option-anarcho-abundancism
Trusts: The Big Heist Against Humanity (article): @amaterasusolar/trusts-the-big-heist-against-humanity
What in the World is Stigmergy? (article): @amaterasusolar/what-in-the-world-is-stigmergy
Electrogravitics – My Knowledge of Free Energy (article): @amaterasusolar/electrogravitics-my-knowledge-of-free-energy
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.