The Abundance Paradigm
by Amaterasu Solar
Foreword 2024
I wrote this novella in 2008, and have versions of it posted around the web. I will post each chapter in a separate post, and link to previous chapters as I go. There are 12 chapters to the book, and I may not post every day, so I don’t know how long it will be before We get to the end.
The first two chapters provide the setting for what things will look like in the future, and in the third, the diary of Amelia Ringer arrives to give offset.
I was much more naive back then, so do forgive the naiveté. I also changed a few things from the original, but mostly left it alone. See You at the end.
Chapter 5
January 25, 2009
I encounter questions about “sexually deviancy” and especially as it relates to children. I point out that reputation will be everything relative to those whose bliss comes out in loving and nurturing our children. Parents always have the right to give a family to their child, unless there is evidence of mistreatment, a breaking of one of the three Laws, but for any unwanted children, in a system where they are no burden, those who would love them would come forth. Plus, virtually all children will be wanted.
Ah, the three Laws of Ethics. Though Amelia was not the author of the three Laws – they are ancient – it was because of her work that we, humanity, became aware of them as a whole. The Lizard Hearted did not teach these, the only Laws above all else, but rather stressed their legal system. Amelia pointed out that in abundance, there is no need for any other rules, regulations, edicts, acts, bills, mandates, constitutions, decrees, statutes, codes, declarations, etc. – which all our governing legislations were. None of them were called Laws.
The three Laws, of course, are:
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of another Being
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to you alone
3. Do not willfully defraud another Being (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
A Being (with a capital “B”) is a sentient, sapient Being. The beings – animals, plants – which are not considered sentient and sapient are still to be respected, given comfort, if they are domesticated, throughout their lives, and for food, a swift, clean, honorable death. Of course, with the replicators, flesh can be created without the death of animals. Some, like Chef Alouba, still use flesh of animals which had been living, but the practice has mostly fallen into disuse.
Lee and I read on.
As a society, it would be understood that one should always record one’s perspective while with a child, and as soon as a child understands the personal power of documenting one’s own perspective, then they, too, can begin their documentation.
This will virtually eliminate any bad behavior in the social context. Anyone can share their evidence, and reputations will be built. The children will be raised in love.
As for sexual deviancy – whatever that is – amongst adults… Well, I think that the ethical approach is that what adults do in a sexual capacity between consenting parties is no one’s affair but those choosing the way they want to spend their time. As long as the three Laws are kept – what two or more adults choose between themselves is their business.
It will come to pass, in abundance, where no creative bliss is denied, that sex for procreation will be a choice made by all who are ready to give love and guidance to a child. An unwanted child will pretty much cease to come into this world.
February 28, 2009
So many things get better if there is no money – which is the necessary evil in an energy scarcity paradigm. Once you take away the money motivation, by way of abundance, cures are brought forth instead of “treatments” to patent that require repeated purchase.Again, putting forth our resources into bringing forth abundance shows its ethical nature.
Products will gain durability reputations, an ethical quality – no more planned obsolescence. Honesty will be valued, when there is no money to be bribed with. Things will be valued for who made/gave them and for what they bring to our lives.
People don’t seem to grasp how ethical it is choosing abundance, choosing a free interweb, choosing our sovereign right to our perspective, choosing open-source, choosing a Betterment Ethic over a “work ethic” (which is a slave’s creed), choosing our destiny in the direction of abundance. We should be financing research, that all might watch (fully public), to build robots to do the needed things not enough people want to do (many which no one wants to do). To look for and build for things we just hate to do.
Some tell me that we aren’t there yet, robotics is still crude, but I watched a robot programmed, based on a locust’s reaction to the Universe, and it was able to detect and avoid obstacles. It will be mainstream soon – if it’s not suppressed. And this beginning will blossom out rapidly, as the robot’s “awareness” of the Universe is fine-tuned to points where work can be the function of the worker ants we build.
And given that the tech curve, plotted out by a group of statisticians back in the 90’s, shows a geometric progression in tech over the last 5,000ish years, where movement on the line began noticeably upward in the 1800’s, and jumped incredibly in the 1900’s... That tech curve was projected to go infinite in 2012. So if we have locust-derived programming for robots today, a few months from now we’re likely to see significant refinement.
I wonder what infinite tech will look like…
In the meantime, we, as a race must make a choice.
Some have asked me about the possibility of machines gaining consciousness. I explain that everything we create has a level of consciousness, all is Consciousness, and we might as well ask an ant if it’s happy as a machine, for that would be the highest necessary level of consciousness to provide us with abundance. And it would be unethical to try for much higher consciousness, just as it would be unethical to bring a child into the Universe unloved.
And what would be the point? Just to prove it could be done? Who cares? I might presume so. But in abundance, why would we want to complicate our lives with those ethics?
I am enjoying the questions I am getting online. Some of them are well directed. It is allowing me to look at many angles and consider what it would look like in abundance. I keep coming up with Heaven.
Amelia had been mostly right – artificial intelligence became a “thing” for a while and it is used now in a few areas that need quick thinking, but mostly We don’t need it. We see Heaven now daily. Every individual can now choose the style of life they wish to live – in the community of those who share their preference, or as hermits, even. In abundance, it is a choice. Most groups maintain a presence on the Web, and can be found and read up on. People have a tendency to flock together by interests, though with the J.D.’s, family ties are kept by most. I tend towards hermitism, with Lee as my other half. But there are people who make house rounds daily – everybody is going to open parties or throwing open parties or both. In fact, lots of parties, from subdued intelligencia rationally playing with the puzzle pieces of life to the frat bash style, parties are ubiquitous.
Entertainment of others by hosting parties has become an art.
But what flourishes most is Love.
It’s hard to imagine seeing the vision of what could be and not having everyone else saying, “Well, duh.” It’s hard to imagine the blinders the scarcity paradigm wrapped around the minds of those who lived within it.
Then again… There had been those who deliberately amped up “scarcity awareness.” They amped up fear. They plotted and planned and folded information to show as little as possible of what was really going on, in politics (which was just a play they sold as “reality”), in tech, in cures, in spiritual growth, in ethics. Selected ignorance was the fare of the day, and many of these who had resources also plotted ways to take over the Human race, bring it back to a more “manageable” number, keep it in slavehood.
Amelia called them Lizard Hearted. Most everyone now knows who the Lizard Hearted, the psychopaths in power, were, and that Amelia called them that. Interesting that many of those she called Lizard Hearted had a specific gene that caused psychopathy, and they started out as the families running the operations here on Earth.
The Lizard Hearted were also developed on Earth, but lacked the DNA of galactic royalty – which Humans all have – and the ability to love. Many of the “leaders” of Earth had been Lizard Hearted, preferring to toy with the humans they led, making plans to assert power, derived from the scarcity paradigm through the accumulation of the money that kept them in control.
It’s rather amazing how much of the truth of our history was available in the infosphere even back in Amelia’s time. Most people that encountered it did not believe it, however, preferring the picture that the Lizard Hearted painted, calling the truth “myths.” The Terra Papers, written by Robert Morning Sky and taken from the Hopi teachings that were given to them by an ET in 1947 – the Papers were online. They described well the history of Earth – but few who read them actually believed them.
But as Amelia rose in the awareness of the infosphere, as more and more contemplated what she had to say, the Ideas she had…more and more secrets began to break the surface, like so many bubbles from an underground hot spring. The human “toadies,” who did the useless ELiters’ bidding, saw that there was no need to stay true to their “elite” masters, nothing was (or would be) held over their heads, because their knowledge would free all humanity from reliance on the “elite,” making them elite no more. More and more people aligned themselves with the efforts to build abundance for the human race, and in short order, the truth came out and Humans claimed their collective throne of the planet and solar system of Eridu.
Amelia’s diary continued…
March 15, 2009
OMG! I was asked to appear on The Stewart Report! I was posting about the abundance paradigm, and the path to get there, what to expect and all – posting all that on the Stewart Nation forum, and it seems that Stephen Stewart himself became intrigued! He offered me the Stewart Bump!I will be flown to NYC – still unclear when exactly – to prepare for and appear on his show! I am so excited!
“Ah, yes!” Lee exclaimed. “That was what really got the ball rolling.”
I nodded, “Yep. That episode is a classic. Bless Stephen for having the sight to see what it all meant!”
One question I get a lot about the abundance paradigm is, “What about lazy people?” I ask, What about them? If their bliss is to be a couch potato, and since their work is not needed and they are no drain on the system, just leave them be! Get on with your own life. But I also point out that most people are lazy out of boredom, being unable to afford to do what they really want to do (race cars, climb mountains, create stained glass art, teach children, scuba dive in Barbados, play video games, create video games, go to amusement parks, design amusement park rides, start a band, research for cures, understand particle physics, coordinate affairs, attend affairs, write useful programs, improve programs – whatever a person might take their bliss from).
So “laziness” will be a temporary condition for nearly all. When there is abundance, there is also no such thing as laziness.
Others object, “But that costs money! How will we get the money?”
I ask them how much R&D 700 billion dollars might afford. Given that in this country we are “bailing out” the Lizard Hearted at incredible sums, why don’t we instead bail out humanity from the heretofore unassailable scarcity, poverty, hunger and humiliation we have been resourcefully kept within?
Why not spend the money to rid our world of money, instead of setting ourselves up for hyperinflation, and thereby economic collapse. For that is what we are doing.
Right now in history we can finally rid ourselves of all barriers to realizing each individual’s potential. Why don’t we do what it takes?
I smiled. Yes, though she didn’t grasp that the government was a corporation and we had no control of how it spent the money it took from us, Amelia was right. And thanks to Stephen Stewart, her message hit the tipping point. We made the right choice, and the rest is history.
I reached up and ran my fingers through Lee’s hair. “Tomorrow is the annual show in San Francisco. The house is headed that way so that we can have a good vantage for what the Fireworks Boys have in store for us tomorrow night.” The Fireworks Boys was one of the best fireworks enthusiast groups around, though they included “girls” too.
“Great,” Lee responded. “It’s been a while since I’ve seen fireworks – at least four months!”
I called to the house, asking for a meal of fresh, small Brussels sprouts, lasagna with Portabella mushrooms, crusty, buttery garlic bread, and a freshly baked raspberry tart with lots of whipped cream for dessert. I suggested to Lee that we head to the dining area for our dinner, and after a quick query about the menu – which he approved of – we headed that way.
Past Chapters:
The Abundance Paradigm Novella; Chapter 1 (article): @amaterasusolar/the-abundance-paradigm-novella-chapter-1-2024-edition
The Abundance Paradigm Novella; Chapter 2 (article): @amaterasusolar/the-abundance-paradigm-novella-chapter-2-2024-edition
The Abundance Paradigm Novella; Chapter 3 (article): @amaterasusolar/the-abundance-paradigm-novella-chapter-3-2024-edition
The Abundance Paradigm Novella; Chapter 4 (article): @amaterasusolar/the-abundance-paradigm-novella-chapter-4-2024-edition
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to My work for Humanity:
Link to a glossary I did for the The Terra Papers – with a link to them included: https://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/167/terra-papers
Can You Gaetz Which One is Which? (article): @amaterasusolar/can-you-gaetz-which-one-is-which
They Really ARE 1984ing Us (article): @amaterasusolar/they-really-are-1984ing-us
I Have Authority Over You (article): @amaterasusolar/i-have-authority-over-you
UBI – Is Universal Basic Income what We want? (article): @amaterasusolar/ubi-sl8s1p
A Discussion on Accounting for Our Energy Added (article): @amaterasusolar/a-discussion-on-accounting-for-our-energy-added
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.