Who do You think planned and paid for the demic?
Who do You think aimed to get Us to roll up Our sleeves for a death jab, for Their profit?
Who do You think are paying for pushing the BS "Human-created climate change?"
Who do You think wants Us in 15 minute prisons, eating bugs and fake “food,” with CBDC’s and social credit scores for control, neuralinked like Borg?
Who do You think are creating "wars" that profit Them irrespective of who "wins?"
Who do You think are trafficking children?
Who do You think created the LGBTQ(RSTUVWXYZ) “movement?”
Who do You think are paying for the spraying of Our skies with toxins?
Who do You think are gathering Our DNA in “test swabs?”
Who do You think are paying for Our children to be taught that the goal in life is to figure out what of a gazillion “genders” They are?
Who do You think are paying hoards of People to move into foreign (to Them) lands?
Do You think that the stuff We see in Their media is true? Or are sandy hooks being cast into Our emotions to drag Us where They want Us?
I am sure there is plenty more that can be added to this list of thing being created for Us with money behind it. But given just this list alone We can gather that, overall, nothing We see in society is organic. Any organic emergences are quashed and ignored.
But the question is, “Who?”
Many, no doubt, will claim one group of Us Humans on this, Our planet – 15+ million working class People in many sects of a religion. The Jews.
But I contend that the Ones really in control, the Ones affecting all this inorganic mess, are Ones We never see, most likely with names of Orsini, Medici and other Roman names – Rome never died. They allow psychopaths in the Jewish group to "succeed," who do the work for the hidden Ones (hidden hand), and pay People to point to the whole group as a scapegoat, so People will not look at Them.
If You point to that group...You serve the psychopaths in control, whether You’re aware of it or not. Just saying.
Now some of You might think We should start pointing fingers at Italians, or Catholics, or some other such group, based on the origin I suggest. But… It’s none of the groups the psychopaths in control divide Us into. Whatever group by happenstance had some of the members end up with the lion’s share of wealth/money is not the group – the true group is, as I have indicated, psychopaths.
Money systems – be they in trade/barter on up to electronic bits – will promote psychopaths to the top. Small wonder We see all these psychopathic things foisted on Us with claims they are organic, or lies to cover real motive. Money = power, as most of Us know, and power draws psychopaths like feces draw flies.
And psychopaths, unlike most of Us, will break the Laws of Ethics to get and keep the most power/money.
If We want a society where psychopaths have no foothold in gaining power over the rest of Us, We need to be rid of the chains that bind Us, the requirement to add Our energy somehow to get tokens that account for it – be the tokens in eggs, shells, beads, metals, paper, or those electronic bits.
Far too many of Us think that We must account for Our energy for society to function. But in fact, 80% of the “jobs” out there do not add needed things at all, and all surround the movement of money, overall upwards to the psychopaths in control.
And in fact, there are examples of societies with no money, and I am sure My regular readers have heard this before. LOL! In societies that emerged in abundance, where all the was needed was there for the taking – mainly “island paradises” – They did not account for the energy Each was adding. Characteristics seen in them all were:
1. The caring Ones took care of things, not the psychopaths controlling things
2. The People operated on social currency – They did things for the appreciation for Their efforts that They received, the thanks, the love, the lauds, the fame, the Self satisfaction, and other such positive returns
3. Any lazy Ones (very few) earned disgust, scorn, being ignored
4. AnyOne who chose unEthical behavior (break the three Laws of Ethics) earned reviling, and being cast out (or killed)
5. The People were happy, playful, creative, loving, giving, caring, compassionate
From this We can see that without money, without having to account for Our energy added into a system, Humanity will emerge as a loving society. And given that big question I get is, “How will the needed work no One wants to do get done?,” We have robots now that can do all the uncreative work – repetitious, boring, and such – and if there is creativity involved, with 80% of Us free to do what We love to do, there will surely be enough of Us wanting to do creative things to earn the praise of the rest.
Again, I will go over how We get rid of the need for money:
1. As money merely accounts for Our energy added into a system, adding free energy technologies will make the point to money use vanish – 100% of the cost of everything is energy: the resources sit here freely, but it takes energy to put them into useful configuration
2. Once free energy is flowing, in about 10 years the effort to collect the penny for the house (or whatever) will not be worth it.
3. As robots to do the necessary work no One wants to do (like clean commodes for example), We apply Our creativity to creating them – plenty of Us love to create robots, and We can create robot-fixing robots, if not enough of Us love to fix robots
In the end, the caring Ones will take care of things and We will be truly free, able to follow Our bliss, fulfill Our potential, make Our dreams come true.
See links for info on free energy, a blueprint, and more below.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to info:
Blueprint for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns (article): @amaterasusolar/blueprint-for-a-society-of-ethical-sovereigns
Electrogravitics – My Knowledge of Free Energy (article): @amaterasusolar/electrogravitics-my-knowledge-of-free-energy
The Three Laws of Ethics (article): @amaterasusolar/the-three-laws-of-ethics
Abundancism – It’s Not Working for a Living; It’s Loving the Work You’re Living (article): @amaterasusolar/abundancism-its-not-working-for-a-living-its-loving-the-work-youre-living
Just Stop Consenting! (article): @amaterasusolar/just-stop-consenting
Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): @amaterasusolar/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical-ground
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.