https://images.app.goo.gl/YXj7x8zmyGXk2Sua8
It's difficult for me to add much to what Corey Lynn has already provided except to say that it reinforces what I've been writing about for years now... and to use it to keep connecting the dots about who and what is behind the New World Order, or whatever you wish to call it. The eugenics network is like a vast spiderweb of recurring actors inside government agencies, NGO's (foundations and other philanthropic/activist organizations), corporations, institutions, etc., all working in concert with one another toward a similar goal- global control. I'll endeavour to make the links and keep the focus on the elites that are pulling the strings behind the scenes.
People tend to think of their medical records as being private- something kept between their physician and themselves. Nothing could be further from the truth. It was back in the 1980's that I learned of a facility in Youngstown, Ohio that keeps records of every American's medical history, yet when I tried to Google it I came up with entries having to do with football rather than medicine... from what I can discern it has been scrubbed. This may prove to be in the long run inconsequential- people are voluntarily giving their genetic information away to private corporations (who do not keep them private) such as 23 & Me, Ancestry.com, MyHeritage, and others.
On the surface these companies appear legitimate- offering to trace your ancestry looking for ties to nobility etc.. However, that's only on the surface... these companies were almost exclusively funded by DARPA and In-Q-Tel (the CIA's tech funding apparatus). You can depend that whatever you share with these "private" corporations will wind up in a government database. The purpose is the same now as it was at the dawn of the eugenics era- to determine who should reproduce and who should not.
The sales pitch is the only thing that's changed. After all, if your genetic markers show a predisposition toward Down Syndrome, cancer, or some other disease it may make you think twice about having children. This information, as is all data gathered by social media giants, is for sale to insurance companies and other organizations whose interests may in fact be inimical to your own... organizations whose purpose may be in intimidating or coercing you into not reproducing. Basically this is nothing more than Hitler's T-4 program 2.0- written in benign terms this time around... or what I call Therapeutic Fascism. Just as it was with the Nazi eugenicists in Germany and the "sterilization squads" in the US and throughout Europe in the 1930's, the same people are pulling the strings from behind the scenes.
Since the dawn of eugenics, they’ve tried to trace the pedigree and traits of human beings so as to control the masses. Through DNA, they have not only accomplished this, they have extended a branch to the population to show off their ancestral trees. Much like in the days of pedigree fairs, people had no idea what they were signing up for.
• Bill Gates funded scientists to study 40,000 DNA samples from 23andMe and assessed genes having to do with preterm labor and God knows what else.
• Billionaires, government and big pharma are investing in biotechnology companies that transform cells and rewrite DNA, amassing the world’s largest stores of “usable” designer genetic code.
• 30 million Americans have already voluntarily submitted their DNA to the likes of 23andMe, Ancestry, MyHeritage, Genomelink and several others.
One may very reasonably ask: Why would "scientists" funded by Bill Gates have access to genetic information compiled by a private company? Although the discovery of DNA wouldn't come until decades later, the study of the "human pedigree" began long ago. The history of eugenics, published in the eugenics archive, explains that eugenics researchers had attempted to trace the inheritance of a trait through a family tree, or pedigree, by analyzing their genetics. However, at that time they were not aware that DNA was the molecule of heredity. Today, they use these DNA “markers” to follow trait inheritance. Back in the early 1900s, they had to conduct interviews on medical histories, which were submitted to the Eugenics Record Office in New York, where they stored documentation on family genealogy with traits and medical conditions.
Eugenicists, mostly known as “philanthropists” in this day and age, spent decades compiling information on populations, under the guise of “medical records.” From the moment you step into a doctor’s office, you are briskly filling out forms, describing yours and your families entire health background. From school forms to maternal databases, the Electronic Health Records (EHR) put in place by Barack Obama, and the mandatory diabetes registry Thomas Frieden established in New York, the number of databases collecting data on every individual – is frankly, off the charts. Rest assured, whatever isn’t collected directly from you, is being collected by big tech, all the way down to what road you are driving down to what pair of underwear you purchased online yesterday. There is a reason for all of this data collection. What communities are the poorest? What people are carrying diseases or deformities? What’s everyone’s race? But indeed, it didn’t stop there. They needed more – they wanted your DNA. [Emphasis added]
Now it becomes clear why Silicon Valley and the social media giants (Facebook, Amazon, Google, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) are compiling data on all of their users and selling it to the highest bidder... and it isn't just to track your purchasing preferences so that advertising can be tailored to suit your tastes. You can also rest assured that if you have had a blood test, or urine analysis, your DNA has been recorded and saved to a database- either with your consent, or not. Moreover, the purpose is not to keep you healthy, but to determine your "place" in society. "For those claiming “tinfoil hat,” here’s a quick lesson in how capitalism works. You don’t give away the farm for free unless you are getting something spectacular in return. Ask yourself – why do they want all of this data? Are they looking to heal the world OR shape the world? "
Companies such as 23andMe, Ancestry, MyHeritage, Genomelink, Promethease, Lifenome, GEDmatch, Family Tree DNA, and numerous others have flooded the market, enticing people to submit their saliva samples for FREE testing and extraordinary information on their heritage, traits, and health. Isn’t that sublime? And, they’ve become such a hit, that many of them have set up affiliate marketing so that others can promote this wonderful service of collecting your genetics.
Genomelink itself has claimed to have tested over 30 million Americans, and that's only one company (and by far not the largest). For example, Genomelink tells you that you should “go beyond genealogy and health risk to discover how DNA shapes aspects of your daily life that you care about. Instant access to 25 trait reports upon uploading your raw data, with 100+ total trait reports available.” What can you learn about yourself, or shall we say… what will they learn about you? According to their website, they can assess your intelligence, personality, physical traits, and even food & nutrition. Isn’t that something? They don’t gloat about the fact that they can also trace your genealogy, while telling you how “intelligent” you may be. Genomelink is very excited about the fact that almost 30 million Americans have already been tested in the United States alone.
Let's slam on the brakes for a moment here and take a giant step back. There are a lot of unsubstantiated assumptions being made here. How do we actually know that there's a link between DNA (genetics) and intelligence? That's only one example, but lets stay with it for a moment. If one or both parents are highly intelligent there's no guarantee that their offspring will share the same traits. It can be assumed that two intelligent parents will likely provide an environment conducive to learning for their offspring- but there's no credible link that intelligence is an inherited trait. Similarly, if one or both parents are alcoholic, there's no guarantee that their offspring will inherit that trait... alcoholism is a choice- a condition, not a disease that can be passed from parent to child. There is absolutely no conclusive scientific proof that conditions such as alcoholism are genetically transferred... these are assumptions, nothing more. All "proofs" are anecdotal and speculative at best.
The study of genetics seems to be built more on the hubris of the scientists rather than on actual facts... the assumptions vastly outweigh the evidence. If you sign up with Lifenome, you will receive a comprehensive analysis of your DNA on nutrition, fitness, skincare, allergy and personality. Its’ wonderful AI+Genomics engine can assess the cumulative effect of multiple genetic variants that may just have an impact on your wellness. This is ridiculous- nutrition and skin care are learned behaviors that have nothing to do with your DNA. The vast uptick in allergies has more to do with irritants in vaccines than genetics- they are caused, not inherited. The "science" just doesn't match up to reality.
In Bill and Melinda Gates 2019 annual letter, titled ‘We Didn’t See This Coming,’ they talk about at-home DNA tests under “Surprise #2.” The Gates Foundation helped fund a 23andMe study, whereby scientists reviewed more than 40,000 samples and discovered a potential link between preterm labor and six genes – including one that regulates how the body uses the mineral selenium... The Gates are essentially funding and running the worldwide vaccine industry, which is causing a great deal of injury – in some cases permanent, causing infertility, and even death, with a very good chance that it is also increasing the child mortality rate in developing countries. So why not “invest” in cures for child mortality as well? Oh, but they have. In fact, just this month they gave another $180 million to CHAMPS, a global health network headquartered in the Emory Global Health Institute. That brings their investment in CHAMPS up to $271 million to date.
The Gates' and their foundation is at the vanguard of the global population control movement... what wasn't said above is that the focus of their vaccine distribution is in Africa, Asia and the developing world. And the UN is behind them as are other NGO's such as the Clinton Global Initiative and our friends at the Rockefeller Foundation. The Rockefellers have such a close relationship with the UN one may even believe them to be synonymous- the Rockefellers even donated the land upon which the UN building stands in NYC.
While all of these services purport ways of helping you to become the best “you” possible, they are cataloging terabytes of personal data, family history, ancestry, intelligence, medical markers, and a myriad of other traits. Scientists everywhere are having the time of their lives. Some want this data so bad, they are willing to offer this DNA collecting service for free, and of course for those that charge, you can easily find these kits at your local Walgreens or online at Amazon.
Of course what's never mentioned is who has access to all of this genetic information people so willingly give up and what they do with it. To the people behind all of this "science" you being the "best you can be" isn't even a consideration. To those people it's all about control and your information is a weapon they can use against you. "From biotechnology to genomes and genetics, it’s been all the buzz for scientists, philanthropists, and the wealthy. Companies have sprung up everywhere since the last 70s, just a few years after the sterilization law was repealed. Genetech was the first publicly traded biotech company in 1980."
For six billionaires, their intrigue continued to grow, along with their investments. Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, Michael Bloomberg, Peter Thiel, and Walt Disney’s great-nephew Tim Disney have all invested in various biotech companies over the past few years. In fact, according to Family Capital’s estimate, roughly 20% of investments done by family offices go into biotech or related industries. Investments in synthetic biology start-ups have increased from $374 million in 2012 to $1.2 billion in 2016, according to data from CB insights.
Besides Bill Gates, two names pop out at me- Peter Thiel and Richard Branson. Thiel because of his interest in using the blood of children as an anti-aging tonic and Richard Branson because of his probable involvement with the Clintons and child trafficking in and around the Caribbean. The link between these biotech firms and child trafficking seems abundantly obvious to me. Branson is involved in transportation and his mother Eve, is a noted "British philanthropist and child welfare advocate." As many independent journalists have discovered, many, if not most of these child welfare NGO's are fronts for child trafficking. The involvement of the Disney family also raises some red flags.
Bill Gates for example, invested $275 million into Ginko Bioworks, which is a company that designs custom microbes that could one day be used to build living things out of nothing. How do they achieve this? They use “genetic engineering to design and print new DNA for a variety of organisms – from plants to bacteria – that can then be used for anything from killing antibiotic-resistant germs to producing artificial sweetener and cheaper perfume.” They reprogram the DNA of plants and other organisms. Even Bayer jumped on board for a cool $100 million investment into Ginko. Bayer is of course now the parent company of Monsanto, the world's largest producer of GMO foods.
Ginko Bioworks is one of numerous biotech companies that Bill Gates invests in. He’s also involved with the fertilizer industry, lab grown meat, vaccines, big pharma, climate change and sustainability, reproductive health, population control, creating a global network of hospitals and clinics in Africa and other countries, and countless other endeavors that have a direct impact on human lives. Gates also started “The Giving Pledge,” whereby 204 of the wealthiest individuals in the world, from 23 countries, are pooling their money into “philanthropic” adventures across the globe. Some of its members are Michael Bloomberg, Richard Branson, Edgar Bronfman, Warren Buffet, Victor Pinchuk, Ted Turner, and Mark Zuckerberg just to name a few. The man has his finger on the pulse of nearly every health-related industry that makes decisions about what humans consume, ingest, inject, and are exposed to.
Another interesting name here is Edgar Bronfman, former CEO of Seagrams and father to Claire who has pleaded guilty in the NXIVM scandal. All of the names mentioned above have nothing to do with philanthropy in any genuine connotation of the word, but are all globalist elites whose focus is control. Ted Turner is one of the names thought to be behind the Georgia Guidestones. Whether true or not, he is one of the modern day Malthusians using his money and power for the population control movement. Buffet has donated the preponderance of his fortune to the Gates Foundation it should also be pointed out.
DNA and genetics are the name of the game. How do these tie into vaccines, GMOs, and even Planned Parenthood? Speaking of Planned Parenthood, Gates ties to Planned Parenthood go beyond the Global Fund. In 2003, Bill Moyers interviewed Bill Gates, on the PBS show “NOW with Bill Moyers”, in a special 60-minute episode titled, “Health, Wealth and Bill Gates.” Here is the complete transcript. In this interview Bill Gates stated:
When I was growing up, my parents were always involved in various volunteer things. My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with that. And so, it’s fascinating. At the dinner table my parents are very good at sharing the things that they were doing. And almost treating us like adults, talking about that.
Gates goes on to say in the same interview that his mother was involved with the United Way, group that decides how to allocate the money and looks at all the different charities and makes the very hard decisions about where that pool of funds is going to go. So, I always knew there was something about really educating people and giving them choices in terms of family size.
Gates has always been about controlling population size, so it should come as no surprise that he would be embraced by the other elites with the same worldview. Now the study of genetics has transcended mere genetics and entered the realm of synthetic genes. In 2015, Scripps Research developed an artificial antibody to inactivate the HIV virus. “By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.” They are testing it on Ebola, Malaria, Influenza and Hepatitis as well. The first human trial, called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer (I.G.T.) is underway and several new ones are planned. Chief scientific officer at Sanofi stated, “It could revolutionize the way we immunize against public health threats in the future.” The synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.
This is the Brave New World of genetics... reengineering the human genome into something artificial. According to those pushing this new "science" it will enable us to defeat disease. But wait... the elites are concerned about overpopulation. Disease is one of nature's "tools" to prevent overpopulation- if we eradicate disease how can we prevent a population bomb, as pseudo-scientist Paul Erlichman described it. Clearly there's another agenda at play here, one that does not bode well for humanity. In this Brave New World the elites- via government- will have to determine who gets to live and who dies... and of what. Obamacare provided "death panels" to make such determinations- the elderly, the "infirm," those who would be a drain on society. Sound familiar? It should it's right out of the Nazi/ Margaret Sanger-Planned Parenthood playbook. This is part and parcel of the Nazi T-4 Program. I read that recently a young man in France was "allowed to die" by starvation- against his and his family's wishes. He was injured in an accident and was unable to take care of himself. What's important is who made the decision- the government, not the patient or his family. People will probably remember Charlie Gard, the infant in the UK whose parents were refused a visa to take him to Italy for medical treatment. That's what this is about- the elites and government making decisions about who lives and who dies. You can take this to the bank... if Charlie Gard was a child of the elites, he'd likely still be alive- he would possess the proper DNA.
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/eugenics-infertility-population-growth-crisis-part-3/
