By looking at the title of this Hive-Blog article here of mine, it is fairly clear that what I have written herein is going to shock you. Any of you who have followed me here on Hive Blog already know that Fraidy Reiss is the founder of Unchained At Last, which is not what it presents itself to be. I’ve mentioned about Hillary Clinton’s disgraceful past in previous Hive-Blog articles of mine. Anyhow, before we get to all of the juicy stuff, I would like to touch upon something interesting herein.
How many of you have been following the primaries and caucuses throughout the United States of America? I know what you’re thinking. It seems that all you ever hear on the news these days is about the coronavirus pandemic. I got wind that YouTube had recently started demonetizing any videos that made mention of the coronavirus. Let’s be glad that Hive Blog and DTube are nothing like YouTube.
One presidential candidate that has me concerned is a Bill Weld. He is a Republican politician who is trying to push President Donald J. Trump out of the Republican nomination for the presidential election this November. Luckily, Bill Weld has gotten nowhere in his quest to get into the Oval Office. We should all be glad that he will likely get nowhere in his race for president. Now, what about former Vice President Joe Biden? Well, that’s another Hive-Blog article for another time. Our main fear here is that Bill Weld would pose a danger to our nation if he ever were to be elected president.
In figurative words, Bill Weld can be best described as the Chief Executive Officer and the mouthpiece of all the self-proclaimed child advocates and self-appointed pedo-experts of our nation. When he was the Governor of Massachusetts so many years ago, he set out to bring about tougher penalties for violating the statutory-age-of-consent laws in his state jurisdiction. The statutory age of consent in Massachusetts was back then and still is 16 years old.
If my memory serves me correctly regarding a television broadcast that I saw so many years ago, Mr. Weld mentioned something in a speech that he gave to his constituents about having ratified laws that would impose mandatory sentences for anyone who violated the statutory-age-of-consent laws in his state jurisdiction. Now, some of you may think that his actions in that regard were well intended. However, if you read my previous Hive-Blog articles, you will find that the statutory-rape laws in our nation are far from being fair and they have a propensity to punish the wrong people. Moreover, in his same speech, he kept bringing up the point about how he wanted to punish 18- and 19-year-old men for getting 14-year-old girls pregnant. In other words, he couldn’t have cared less if these young men were to marry these girls and love them unconditionally and provide for them; Mr. Weld wanted to send them all to prison and load their names and personal information up on the sex-offender registry. Meanwhile, deadbeat teenage fathers who were too young to vote would continue to have the run of the mill in destroying the lives of underage girls they got pregnant.
Mr. Weld also ran for vice-president on the Independent ticket back in 2016. The fact alone that he was the running mate of a dunce like Gary Johnson strongly demonstrates that he is not anyone who cares about the facts but only cares about getting into office. The fact that he used to work for the United States Department of Justice could explain why he holds himself to the school of thought that the criminal justice system is always right about everything and can never be refuted under any circumstances. Mr. Weld is like a male clone of Fraidy Reiss.
Speaking of Fraidy Reiss, out of curiosity, I was surfing throughout YouTube to see whether or not she had posted a video that was any more recent than three months ago. I had predicted that the coronavirus pandemic had significantly slowed down her efforts as well as those of her organization, Unchained At Last, to further their agenda, and I was right. On her organization’s website, she revealed that she had been working remotely because of the coronavirus pandemic. To the best of my knowledge, she hasn’t held any more demonstrations anywhere in our nation lately within the past month either except for supposedly Wisconsin, but don’t hold me to it. Ms. Reiss calls those demonstrations “Chain-Ins” in which women dress up in bridal gowns and wear chains around them. How creepy!
A. The Current Coronavirus Pandemic’s Impact Upon Fraidy Reiss And Her Cohorts Could Pave The Way For Their Opponents To Strike Back Against Their Agenda
There can be no question that the coronavirus pandemic is indeed a worldwide tragedy that is adversely affecting everyone of every socioeconomic status. However, the fact that political leaders are forcing everyone to stay in their residences throughout most of our nation and legislators are beginning to place bills pertaining to Ms. Reiss’s agenda on the back burner could also be a golden opportunity for each and every one of us who oppose Ms. Reiss’s agenda, to fight back against her and her femi-Nazi cohorts and undo the damage that they have done to the marriage laws throughout our nation. Now we have the time to organize and defy all of her actions, and all we need to do so is a laptop, a telephone and Internet access.
The state legislature in Massachusetts has been pushing a bill through that would prohibit anyone from getting married before 18 years of age under any circumstances. Currently, Massachusetts adheres to the English Common Law in determining the minimum age floor for getting married, which is 12 years old for girls and 14 years old for boys. The status quo in this regard has worked successfully in Massachusetts for nearly an eternity, and there is no compelling justification to change this law.
The Governor of Massachusetts, Charlie Baker, has not signed the above-described marriage bill into law yet, and the delay of his doing so is going to give every resident of Massachusetts who opposes that same bill the opportunity to contact him and ask that he veto it if and when it does finally get to his desk. Now we all have the time we need to contact both state and Federal legislators here on our nation to convince them that we don’t want these laws needlessly being shoved down our throats because of the severe repercussions that these new laws could have on our society as a whole.
I realize that it has been a while since I’ve posted an article here on Hive Blog regarding underage adolescent marriage and the problems that Ms. Reiss’s agenda to eliminate it here in our nation is going to cause everyone if she has her way about it. However, after I saw this one video on YouTube of an interview that Ms. Reiss provided on February 12, 2020, I felt the driving desire to revisit this topic and give it the attention that it so much deserves.
A woman named Theresa who belongs to the Kelly Nicole Foundation hosted the interview inasmuch as there has been pending legislation in Minnesota to outlaw 16- and 17-year-old minors from getting married under any circumstances. Kelly Nicole is another one of those unknown individuals in the music entertainment industry who nobody will even remember 10 years from now. She makes me think of these numerous unknown authors who speak out against underage adolescent marriage, even though these people have opinions that carry no more weight than anyone else’s.
In that same interview, Theresa spoke with Ms. Reiss, Emily Steinert and Jane Keller, who are all from Unchained At Last. Emily Steinert is an attorney who works for Unchained At Last, and Jane Keller is some kind of intern for that organization. I find it interesting how Ms. Reiss continues to beg for money for her organization, but then yet she has no reservations about hiring staff for her organization at lavishly generous starting salaries. It reminds me of the Biblical verse that warns you not to cast your pearls before swine. Below is the video on YouTube with the entire interview.
Fraidy Reiss And Her Cohorts Continue To Peddle Their Lies Regarding Underage Adolescent Marriage
B. Fraidy Reiss And Unchained At Last Will Go To Any Length To Force Their Agenda Down The American People’s Throats
Now, what continues to annoy me about interviews like the one in the above video is that people in them are always running their mouths about how they and many other Americans like them had no idea that a minor could get married at 12, 13, 14, 15 or even 16 years old here in the land of milk and honey. I listen to these people’s voices and I look at their faces, and I know that they were old enough in the 1990s and the early 2000s to have seen all the television talk shows that used to be on the air back then, and there were many teenage guests on those shows who were still minors and married to partners who were not necessarily in their peer group. I have to ask if people like Theresa have been living under a rock all these years.
Audiences and guest panels on television talk shows openly discussed underage adolescent marriage on these television talk shows back in the 1990s and the early 2000s, and no major disapproval over underage adolescent marriage was ever really expressed among any of these people. I do vaguely recall that one woman on The Jenny Jones Show told this one man that she thought that he liked getting “little girls” pregnant and then marrying them. However, nobody had ever stressed that they wanted for underage adolescent marriage to be completely outlawed here in the United States of America. I even once saw a 28-year-old man pull out an engagement ring and propose marriage to a 15-year-old girl on Montel, and Montel Williams was quite moved by it in a positive and sentimental sort of way.
If you go to YouTube and watch clips of different television talk shows from the 1990s and the early 2000s, you will come across a considerable number of episodes of these same shows where girls as young as 13 years old have appeared on the guests panels and have either revealed that they were married or have spoken about their wedding plans for the near future. These young girls, and even young boys, usually appeared on The Jenny Jones Show, Sally Jessy Raphael, Montel, Geraldo, The Jerry Springer Show, and Maury. Sometimes these underage brides and grooms made appearances as guests on Phil Donahue, Rolonda, and Ricki Lake. I do not recall Oprah Winfrey ever allowing such guests on her television talk show, although she did have Melanie Griffith on her show and she expressed no disapproval that Ms. Griffith had become romantically involved as a girl in her early teens with Don Johnson when he was 22 years old.
The only time that I ever recall a significant to-do ever being made about the legality of underage adolescent marriage back in those days was when a 29-year-old man named Wayne Compton had married his pregnant 13-year-old girlfriend named Tina Akers in Maryland in 1998. Societal fundamentalists and femi-Nazi extremists complained that they believed that Mr. Compton had misused the legal institution of marriage as a bulletproof vest against a prospective criminal charge of statutory rape against him.
After the story about Wayne Compton and Tina Akers came out in the press and the media in 1998, state lawmakers in Maryland began to review their marriage laws and make several modifications to them in order to make it more difficult for teenage minors to get married. They did so by changing the Maryland marriage laws over from the English Common Law to a statutory code that would set the minimum age floor at 15 years old in that state. Other state jurisdictions began to mirror their legislative actions after a 22-year-old Nebraska man named Matthew Koso married his pregnant 14-year-old girlfriend named Crystal Guyer in Hiawatha, Kansas seven years later. However, state lawmakers were careful not to ban all underage adolescent marriage inasmuch as they realized that there were compelling situations that necessitated for a minor and his/her partner to have a legal pathway to making their relationship legal in spite of their age difference.
The irony of it all was that Wayne Compton and Matthew Koso were not really bad people. In fact, both of them wanted to step up to the plate as responsible parents to their offspring. People who had never known anyone like them simply did not have the full understanding of the compelling circumstances that factored into their respective situations. Meanwhile, deadbeat teenage fathers have continued to become more and more abusive against the underage girls that they impregnate, and our society continues to turn a blind eye to it. In the eyes of American society, being 15 years old and male somehow gives a punk that age a full license to use and abuse any underage girl that they please, and this has been the upside-down standard for way too long here in our nation.
Nevertheless, it is clear that Ms. Reiss and others like her thrive off their lie that the American public at large has been completely unaware and clueless that middle-school-age and high-school-age girls have been getting married for a long time here in the land of milk and honey. They compare apples and oranges, and they add an additional layer of deception to their lie. For example, Ms. Reiss has repeatedly compared Loretta-Lynn-style marriages here in the United States of America with abusive adult/child marriages in the Middle East. Then she pounds this one misguided point of hers to death that the United States Department of State has declared marriage before the age of eighteen to be a human-rights abuse regardless of whether it is forced or voluntary.
Duhhhh, Ms. Reiss! The United States Department of State was referring to oppressive patriarchies in the Middle East and in other parts of the world. That same government agency’s statement had nothing to do with teenage girls willingly marrying their cross-generational partners to legalize their relationships here in the United States of America. Moreover, my maternal grandmother got married at 17 years old and her sister got married at 15 years old, and neither one of them ever complained about being victims of human-rights abuses. My brother-in-law’s mother also got married at 17 years old, and she didn’t ever complain about being a victim of human-rights abuses.
It has been a while since I have checked what state jurisdictions have been doing legislatively regarding underage adolescent marriage. Fortunately, Ms. Reiss and her legion of femi-Nazi extremists have not had the kind of luck they thought they would have in making 18 years old the solid marriageable age everywhere in our nation. I already knew that New Jersey and Delaware no longer allowed for anyone to get married before 18 years old under any circumstances. It was news to me that the United States Virgin Islands had enacted a similar law, whereas previously someone as young as 14 years of age could get married there if he or she went through the proper legal channels to do so. Now that the coronavirus pandemic has raged throughout our nation, our legislators are now finding that they have bigger fish to fry than to waste their time on Ms. Reiss’s apparent man-hating campaign.
C. Fraidy Reiss Has Hypocritically Formed An Alliance With Rape-Enabler Hillary Clinton In Unchained At Last’s Quest To Outlaw Underage Marriage
Throughout the above-described interview, Ms. Reiss continued to cheer Hillary Clinton on for making statements about Ms. Reiss’s mission to end what she believes to be “child marriage” here in the United States of America. She claimed that Ms. Clinton stated that our nation had “two down, only 48 to go” in regard to the fact that only two state jurisdictions in our nation prohibited marriage before the age of eighteen. Ms. Reiss also quoted Ms. Clinton as having stated, “It takes a village to end child marriage.”
If you read my entire Hive-Blog article titled “The Great American Controversy Over Underage Marriage,” you will find out that Hillary Clinton acted as the criminal defense attorney to a 41-year-old man named Thomas Alfred Taylor who raped a 12-year-old girl named Kathy Shelton back in 1975. During the criminal trial proceedings back in 1975, Ms. Clinton got a court order to have Ms. Shelton undergo a psychiatric evaluation, as her way of adding insult to injury, and she did so in an effort to make it look as though Ms. Shelton were the perpetrator of the criminal atrocity against her. A 15-year-old boy named Michael Dale Elzey was the late Mr. Taylor’s accomplice in that brutal rape that left Ms. Shelton sterile for the rest of her life and unleashed a whole series of problems and difficulties for her from that point on.
For some reason or another, Michael Dale Elzey got out of the rape charge with impunity for what he did to Ms. Shelton. Like nowadays, somehow the criminal justice system didn’t take it seriously whenever a male adolescent minor raped a female adolescent minor back in the 1970s. I once viewed a social media account of Mr. Elzey four years ago; and even though this creep is three years older than Ms. Shelton, he actually looked younger and healthier in his social media account picture than Ms. Shelton appeared on camera upon her being interviewed on television at a presidential debate after President Trump had invited her to join him at a press conference at that event. The reason for Mr. Elzey being so was because he got to go on and live his life as though he did nothing wrong, whereas Ms. Shelton had to endure endless suffering as a result of her suffering a brutal rape at his hands and at the hands of the late Thomas Alfred Taylor. I’ve been unable to find Mr. Elzey’s social media account recently.
Hillary Clinton’s transgressions did not end with her criminal defense of the late Mr. Taylor back in 1975. So many years later, a journalist named Roy Reed interviewed her, and she laughed about the entire tragedy involving Ms. Shelton as though Ms. Shelton’s suffering was something for her to deride. As we look back at all of these events, we, as Americans, should be happy that Hillary Clinton did not get elected as president in 2016 and decided never to run for president again. Ms. Clinton has proclaimed herself to be a champion of women and young girls, but her disgraceful actions against Ms. Shelton demonstrate quite the opposite. Therefore, we all have to realize that Fraidy Reiss does not really care about the young girls of our nation.
If Ms. Reiss actually cared about all these young girls who have been getting married at 17, 16, 15, 14, 13 and even 12 years of age here in our nation, then she would not be associating with a rape-enabler like Hillary Clinton. I would have to say the same regarding Ms. Reiss’s relationship with Chelsea Clinton. If you read my Hive-Blog article titled “Chelsea Clinton Doesn’t Truly Care About 13-Year-Old Brides” and take into consideration that her mother, Hillary Clinton, defended the rapist of a 12-year-old girl as his attorney back in 1975, you will realize that the apple doesn’t fall very far from the tree.
In her above-described interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss explained to her that the reason that parents allowed their pregnant underage daughters to get married was because these girls’ parents were worried that the nice guy who “raped” their daughter was going to prison. At first, Ms. Reiss was vague about what she meant in making this statement to Theresa. She referred to these young men as “lucky guys.” Later on, in the interview, Ms. Reiss made it known that she does not differentiate between “statutory rape” and forcible rape. In other words, she had the audacity to equate “statutory rape” to forcible rape in making her point about pregnant adolescent girls below the statutory age of consent marrying the adult fathers of their unborn babies.
Is Ms. Reiss too stupid to see that forcible rape is a violent act of sexual brutality, whereas “statutory rape” is merely a legal construct? She has no right or moral high ground to redefine what rape is and is not, in light of the fact that she hypocritically idolizes a rape-enabler like Hillary Clinton. She also has no right to imply that Loretta-Lynn-style marriages are a form of human trafficking, because she is a friend of Chelsea Clinton and Chelsea Clinton has had strong social ties for some time now with the notorious madam of Little Saint James Island, Ghislaine Maxwell, who aided and abetted the late Jeffrey Epstein in his human-trafficking ring there that involved girls as young as 12 years of age.
It is interesting how much Ms. Reiss seems to be in love with the words “CHILD RAPE” when her own moral compass leaves so very much to be desired. It is though she lives in a make-believe world of age-appropriate perfection to the exclusion of all reality, and, at the same time, she is in bed with the very same people who have enabled the ruthless sexual victimization of young girls barely in their teens or not even in their teens.
It is outrageous that Ms. Reiss and her femi-Nazi cohorts hypocritically wish to overcrowd our prisons and jails with men who don’t belong there, so that these women can fulfill their own agenda. However, why should Ms. Reiss care? She doesn’t have a son. She only has two daughters, and she knows that they’ll never see the inside of a men’s correctional facility for any reason. She and her cohorts even want to overload the sex-offender registry with the names and personal information of men who don’t belong on them. Everyone? Wake up and realize that these women are waging a war against men.
Ms. Reiss? If you are reading this Hive-Blog article here of mine, I want to say to you that I find it very suspicious that you could have enough pull with the legislators there in the United States Virgin Islands to convince them to eliminate the exception in their marriage laws that allowed minors to get married as young as 14 years old under certain circumstances. Little Saint James Island is part of the United States Virgin Islands. Ms. Reiss? Did you travel with the Clintons to Little Saint James Island to sample some of the so-called local attractions while the late Jeffrey Epstein was still running his human-trafficking ring? It doesn’t seem to bother you that both Hillary Clinton and Chelsea Clinton have shady pasts that involve the tragic rape and even sexual trafficking of girls as young as 12 years of age. Ms. Reiss? Perhaps you may even know how Mr. Epstein really died while he was incarcerated.
D. Fraidy Reiss Lied About The Hardships That A Minor Might Encounter In A Marriage
In her above-described interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss brought on her charade of lies and so-called statistical information that I debunked in my Hive-Blog article titled “The Great American Controversy Over Underage Marriage.” She complained about roadblocks in the laws regarding contracts and individual rights that teenage minors supposedly encountered after they got married. However, these are flaws in the law that could easily be fixed by addressing them directly through legislative action rather than banning underage adolescent marriage altogether. In figurative words, Ms. Reiss is of the school of thought that it is better to remove the entire liver from someone’s body in the event of cancer rather than removing the tumors themselves from the liver to arrest the cancer.
Ms. Reiss rambled on in her interview with Theresa about all the doom and gloom that she believes to await a young girl in the event that she gets married in her teens before she is legally old enough to vote. Ms. Reiss may believe that adult men over 21 years old who marry adolescent girls younger than 18 years old force these girls into a life of poverty. However, it is really deadbeat teenage fathers who force underage girls into a life of poverty, and society and the law do nothing about it. It is deadbeat teenage fathers who marginalize adolescent girls (12 to 17 years old) and even cause them to go on welfare. Eliminating underage adolescent marriage will make girls this age more vulnerable to the ulterior motives of deadbeat teenage fathers.
Ms. Reiss lives in the delusion that adolescent girls below 18 years old who have fallen prey to deadbeat teenage fathers are so much better off in every way than ones who have married adult men over 21 years of age. However, when I worked at a social services agency, I met many more teenage girls from Loretta-Lynn-style marriages who were much more contented with their lives than underage girls were who were pregnant with the baby of a teenage boy.
In her above-described interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss insisted that most teenage brides will drop out of high school and never get to college. However, I met many teenage brides in high school and college. Therefore, you cannot be correct in your assertion, Ms. Reiss. As I must reemphasize, it is not older men married to teenage girls who are putting teenage brides into poverty but rather deadbeat teenage fathers who bail on their pregnant teenage girlfriends who are causing this problem for unmarried teenage girls. Older men who marry these adolescent girls have even been known to pay to put their underage wives through college. Take that fact and smoke it in your pipe, Ms. Reiss! I even know of a true story about a 12-year-old girl who married into money and wealth, and her husband was an adult man. I describe that true story in Part B of my Hive-Blog article titled “The Great American Controversy Over Underage Marriage.”
In her interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss actually contradicted her own misinformation by giving two conflicting assertions. She first insisted that it was legally near impossible for an underage adolescent bride to get a divorce. Then she turned around and stated that 70 to 80 percent of teenage female brides who wedded before they were legally old enough to vote ended up getting divorced. Ms. Reiss? You can’t have it both ways. Either one or the other is true, but they both cannot be true. My concern is that neither of these two assertions of yours are true.
In their interview with Theresa, some of the women in Unchained At Last complained that legislators have told them that they “unwavingly” oppose placing their legal minimum age floor at eighteen in every state jurisdiction of our nation but that they won’t articulate their reasons for doing so. Well, my Hive-Blog article here articulates more than enough valid reasons for legislators not to go along with Ms. Reiss’s agenda.
Ms. Reiss stated in her interview with Theresa that there was very little data here in our nation regarding what she believed to be “child marriage.” Yet she continues to pull so-called statistical information and so forth from the top of her head, and I was able to identify numerous flaws in her arguments.
In her above-described interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss insisted that underage brides had no place to go to in the event that their husband physically abused them inasmuch as she believed that there were laws on the books that could cause homeless shelters to become criminally liable if they took in a minor. However, she is wrong, because Covenant House takes in homeless youngsters as young as 13 years old all the time; and I have never heard of the authorities ever running interference against them for doing so.
Ms. Reiss stated in her interview that in some state jurisdictions, a married minor who escaped a violent and abusive situation with their spouse could be charged with a crime inasmuch as they would legally become runaways for leaving their spouses. Now, here is where I bring back my metaphoric point about cutting out the tumor instead of the entire liver to stop a cancer from spreading all over the liver and the body. Instead of making it illegal for teenage minors to get married, why not change the runaway laws in state jurisdictions where they need to be changed so that the authorities cannot treat any married minor as a criminal for escaping their abusive spouse? Of course, this kind of critical thinking doesn’t exist in Ms. Reiss’s world. In her narrow mind, it’s either her way or the highway.
In her interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss misused the argument that minors cannot legally enter into binding agreements or contracts anywhere in our nation. She claimed that most attorneys will not even allow minors to retain them, because their retainer agreements would automatically be null and void. It is true that minors can break out of binding agreements and contracts easily. However, I question Ms. Reiss’s argument regarding lawyers working for minors. I have known of children’s rights attorneys who have represented minors against their parents for various reasons, including emancipation proceedings. Therefore, Ms. Reiss appears to have made up much of the stuff that she fed her audience in that interview.
Nevertheless, if we were to assume just for the sake of argument that Ms. Reiss was entirely correct about how the law works for minors with contracts and retainer agreements, her arguments would only serve the purpose of passing laws that would make it easier for minors to get out of unwanted marriages rather than to outlaw underage adolescent marriage altogether. Moreover, if married minors have such a difficult time accessing the legal tools and resources they need to escape from an unwanted marriage, then this point on Ms. Reiss’s part contradicts her other point that 70 to 80 percent of all married minors end up getting a divorce.
In her interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss claimed that underage marriages that have the happily-ever-after results are statistically unlikely. I say that they are so only in her deluded mind. My maternal grandmother got married at 17 years old and her sister got married at 15 years, and both of them had long, happy lives. My maternal grandmother lived to be 92 years old, and her sister lived well into her nineties. My brother-in-law’s mother got married at 17 years old, and she had a long, happy life. In fact, she lived to be 99 years old.
In her interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss stated that a girl who married as a minor was 3 times more likely to be beaten than a woman who married after her 21st birthday. Well, Ms. Reiss, let me give you something to think about. My maternal grandmother got married at 17 years old, and my maternal grandfather never beat on her. My maternal grandmother’s sister got married at 15 years old, and her husband never beat on her, to the best of my knowledge. As a matter of fact, every woman I’ve ever known who has gotten married before 18 years old were never victims of spousal battery. Therefore, I have to be one to question your so-called information sources.
In her interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss claimed that an underage adolescent bride was 40 percent more likely to have a second child within 24 months of having her first child. No teenage bride I have ever known has fitted that same description. In Part E of my Hive-Blog article titled “The Great American Controversy Over Underage Marriage,” this one 25-year-old woman named Starr whom my mother and I met so many years ago told me and my mother that she got married at 14 years old, and her two daughters were eight years apart in age difference. My maternal grandmother got married at 17 years old, and my mother has a brother who is five years older than her; and her other brother was born ten or so years before she was born. I’ve noticed no significant pattern of what Ms. Reiss described in her interview with Theresa regarding childbirth of underage adolescent brides
E. Fraidy Reiss Was Caught Lying About The Overall Religious Stance On Underage Adolescent Marriage
Ms. Reiss claimed that her organization, Unchained At Last, had gotten astronomical support from religious groups in their mission to seek a ban against all underage marriage here in the United States of America. However, her claim in that respect is highly suspicious in that she insisted that Amish leaders had told her that nobody could get married on their compounds before the age of eighteen inasmuch as no baptisms were performed on anyone until then and being baptized was a pre-requisite for marriage in their religion.
When I stayed at my cousin’s house in Peoria, Illinois back in 2014 for my uncle’s funeral, my cousin told me about a friend of his who was serving time in prison on a drunk driving conviction. He told me that he visited him regularly at the prison where this man was serving his time. My cousin then told me that one day while he was visiting his friend at the prison, he noticed that there was an Amish man in his early twenties who was receiving visits there at the prison. My cousin asked his friend why this Amish man was serving time there at the prison. My cousin’s friend explained to him that this Amish man had married a 16-year-old girl in their church but had not gone through the proper bureaucratic channels to make the marriage legal. My cousin’s friend explained that this Amish man had, therefore, been charged and convicted of statutory rape inasmuch as the statutory age of consent was 17 years old in Illinois and this young man was not legally married to his wife.
I said to my cousin that it concerned me that this Amish man would be vulnerable to all sorts of atrocities in prison, because the Amish were taught from early childhood on to be pacifists. In any event, this true story that my cousin told me regarding the Amish evidences that Ms. Reiss has not been truthful with the public regarding her agenda.
F. Fraidy Reiss Was Not Completely Candid About Her Agenda Regarding Federal Immigration Laws
In her interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss brought up the fact that she and her femi-Nazi colleagues were attempting to change the Federal immigration laws to establish a minimum age of eighteen for anyone to petition a foreign spousal visa and as the minimum age for the person being petitioned for a foreign spousal visa here in our nation. In my Hive-Blog article titled “President Trump Should Veto Immigration Bill Regarding Underage Marriage,” I explained why I felt that this proposal of Ms. Reiss was not a good idea. The main concern that I had about its possible passage was that it could create a whole myriad of foreign mothers having to live in our nation as illegal aliens and fearing possible separation from their American-born children in the future in the event that the immigration authorities were to detect them later on and deport them.
Ms. Reiss and the two other women from Unchained At Last had the nerve to tell Theresa in their interview with her that “parents were petitioning for children as young as 1 year old for a spousal visa.” Then they assured her that no foreign spousal visas had been granted in this event. However, here is my problem with their even mentioning this tidbit of information, if it is true. These are the kinds of fear-mongering tactics that they use to elicit knee-jerk reactions from the public at large, and this is the reason why we all need to stop placing any stock in what these femi-Nazi extremists peddle to us. Moreover, it has nothing to do with a teenager getting married on their own volition.
The reason that there are now more adult men than in previous years who are traveling to foreign nations to marry significantly younger wives whose ages may even dip into the adolescent years is because of the hypergamy practiced among American women that is creating a whole community of incels and perma-virgins. These same men who have been cheated out of their youth and the first-love experience that every teenage boy hopes for are, therefore, resorting to alternative ways of finding love and are going off shore to do so.
Now, I’m not going to criticize Ms. Reiss and the two other women who participated in the above-described interview with Theresa for expressing a concern that people may have been misusing minors to get a quicker and easier pathway to gaining legal entry into our nation. If she and her cohorts were really concerned about that issue, then I would give them all the benefit of the doubt. However, here is the problem that I am having with their school of thought. Our nation also has extraterritorial laws that make it illegal for an American adult to have sexual intercourse with a minor under 16 years old in foreign nations, and foreigners easily take wrongful advantage of these same laws to worm their way into our country illegally; but I have never heard Ms. Reiss and others in Unchained At Last complaining about that situation with our Federal laws.
Parents in Third-World and Fourth-World nations have been known to coach their own kids into having sexual liaisons with adult American tourists traveling abroad so that they can bring criminal charges against them through these same Federal extraterritorial sex laws, because they know that it could mean a free airline ticket for them to the United States of America and a free hotel stay in our nation in the event that a Federal prosecutor asks them and their kids to testify in an American court. Whenever something of that nature happens, it then becomes so easy for these foreigners to do a disappearing act after they are no longer needed in the criminal trial against the adult American tourist who was criminally charged for having sexual relations with a minor under 16 years old abroad. Once they are in our country, then they can easily access the services and assistance of legal advocacy groups that help illegal aliens circumvent the immigration laws in our nation.
If an adult American tourist gets a 14-year-old girl pregnant in one of these poor nations and the girl’s parents decide to contact one of our embassies and press criminal charges against him, it becomes so easy for that youngster and her parents to gain legal entry into the United States of America in the event that a Federal prosecutor offers to have them testify in an American court. American tax dollars will then pay their airline tickets to our nation and their hotel accommodations. Once that young girl and her parents are here in our nation, all they have to do to stay here legally after the trial is over is contact an attorney to seek child support from the adult man who got the underage girl pregnant. Those legal proceedings throw a monkey wrench into the pathway of any immigration official who is trying to force these people to return to their own country after the criminal trial.
Once the 14-year-old girl’s baby is born here in the United States of America, then it automatically becomes an American citizen. The immigration courts are likely not going to force the underage girl to return to her country of origin, and they will not force her parents to return to their country of origin either inasmuch as the underage girl and her baby are not going to be able to take care of themselves.
Ms. Reiss and her cohorts at Unchained At Last have never protested against these same extraterritorial sex laws on our Federal books for providing inventive ways for foreigners to circumvent the immigration laws in our nation. Ms. Reiss has to know that there are 15-, 14-, 13-, 12- and even 11-year-old girls in Third-World and Fourth-World countries whose parents would not hesitate to talk them into giving up their virginity to a complete stranger so that they and their family members can find a way to get into the United States of America and stay here. On the other hand, Ms. Reiss wants to make it illegal for a 20-, 21- or 22-year-old American man to petition for a foreign spousal visa for his 17-year-old wife that he met, fell in love with and married in Austria, even if that man only has six months to live and his wife will not be 18 years old for another year.
Now, don’t get me wrong. I can understand why there are people here in our nation who wanted the Federal extraterritorial sex laws that established an age of consent for American tourists traveling abroad, because, like so many of you, I find it reprehensible that there are Americans who are traveling to poor countries to exploit children as young as 2 or 3 years old sexually. However, if a 20- or 21-year-old college student is at a party somewhere in Europe and he hooks up with a 14- or 15-year-old girl at that party inasmuch as that nation’s culture doesn’t practice age segregation in the social scene and that 20- or 21-year-old man takes that teenage girl back to his hotel room and they become intimate, then I think that it is a waste of our nation’s Federal resources to charge that man with a crime and then fly that young girl and her family members here to the United States of America to testify in what can best be described as a frivolous and malicious carnal knowledge case against the young man. So long as the young girl’s parents have no problem with the tryst, the law of the young girl’s nation has no problem with it and that nation’s culture and society have no problem with it, the American authorities have no business running interference on the matter.
Ms. Reiss and her cohorts at Unchained At Last have never complained about how ridiculous these Federal extraterritorial sex laws are and how foreigners often misuse them to find a way to get into our country and stay here illegally so that they can manipulate the system here eventually to get their green cards. To all of you societal fundamentalists and self-righteous do-gooders who support Ms. Reiss and her legion of femi-Nazi extremists, if any of you are concerned about your underage adolescent daughters being influenced to seek out sexual relationships with older men, then the fact that foreigners are misusing these Federal extraterritorial sex laws to gain entry into our nation and stay here could bring the tide against your belief system. If a 12-, 13- or 14-year-old girl from a Third World country thinks nothing of obeying her mother to have a sexual relationship with a significantly older American man on vacation in her country, so that they can take wrongful advantage of the Federal extraterritorial sex laws of our nation to gain entry here into our nation and stay here one way or another, that same girl is going to be going to school with your underage daughters and influencing them to mirror their habits and their ways.
If you have a daughter who is in middle school or who is just starting high school, one of these young girls who gained entry into the United States of America by voluntarily becoming a “victim witness” in a Federal statutory-rape case through the Federal extraterritorial sex laws could be sitting next to your daughter in a classroom and start telling her how she can manipulate the sex laws in our nation simply by hooking up with an older man. I once saw a documentary about a 17-year-old Costa Rican prostitute who talked an older man into going to bed with her and then blackmailed him afterwards for money inasmuch as it is illegal for anyone to have commercial sex with anyone under 18 years of age in that nation.
Of course, trying to tell someone like Ms. Reiss or her femi-Nazi cohorts about these kinds of situations is like talking to a brick wall. Ms. Reiss and her femi-Nazi cohorts are only going to listen to anything that specifically serves their agenda and nothing else. At the end of the day, women like them believe that all of us men are their carnal property and that they should have complete ownership over how we live our lives.
If a young man is terminally ill and he wants to marry his 15-, 16-, or 17-year-old girlfriend, the solid marriageable age of 18 is not going to help his or his girlfriend’s situation. What if he has a large financial estate to his name and he wants the love of his life to inherit every penny of it after his demise despite that she is not yet 18 years old? These Draconian marriage laws that Ms. Reiss and her cohorts are shoving down the throats of each and every American are not helping the situation. However, these women don’t care so long as they can get their own way about everything.
G. Fraidy Reiss Made Further Misrepresentations In Reporting Her So-Called Findings Regarding Underage Marriage
In her interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss once again brought up the statistics of underage marriages here in the United States of America for the time period of 2000 and 2010. Now, as I have emphasized in previous Hive-Blog articles of mine and I will emphasize again, regardless of whether these same statistics are accurate, they are still misleading inasmuch as they are from the first decade of the 21st century and the marriage laws regarding minors were much more lenient back then than they are now. That is, it was easier for a 13-year-old girl to get married to a boy or a man of any age back then than it is now here in the land of milk and honey. It is like comparing apples and oranges.
In this interview with Theresa, Ms. Reiss simply loved throwing the words “loophole” and “loopholes” around. She insisted that the exceptions to the minimum marriageable age of eighteen in any state jurisdiction was a loophole. However, she cannot be any more wrong than she has been all along. My Hive-Blog article titled “Underage Marriage Is Not A Loophole” clarifies that permitting underage adolescent marriage under certain circumstances is not a loophole, and it provides the specific definition of what a loophole really is.
Ms. Reiss went overboard in her above-described interview with Theresa by insisting that these so-called “loopholes” in the marriage laws throughout our nation allowed someone to marry a minor as young as zero years old. The absurdity of her statement reminds me of this one episode of Montel about teenage marriage in which a man in the audience talked about people getting married at 2 years old and Montel Williams got angry with him for acting so stupid. I remember Montel Williams yelling “Don’t say that!” to that same man in the audience.
Everyone who is reading this Hive-Blog article here of mine, please read what I have to say. We have put up with so much nonsense from Ms. Reiss and others like her for the past four to five years. Now her organization, Unchained At Last, is coming up with a song. How creative of them. These women do not have the best interest of our nation at heart.
H. My Conclusion To This Topic
Ms. Reiss and her legion of femi-Nazi extremists are currently seeking to ban any 16- or 17-year-old from getting married in Minnesota. If you are a resident of Minnesota, DON’T LET IT HAPPEN! Wisconsin already escaped this dreadful agenda this month for now, but our fight against these people is far from over. The coronavirus pandemic has slowed down these people’s efforts, and now those of us who are opposed to their agenda have the golden opportunity to contact lawmakers to ask them not to pass these ridiculous marriage laws that these people are trying to shove down our throats.
We currently have two state jurisdictions (Delaware and New Jersey) where underage adolescent marriage is illegal altogether, but we do not want Minnesota to become the third state jurisdiction here in our nation. If Ms. Reiss and her colleagues really cared about how the American public felt about this issue, she would have requested for state legislatures to place a proposition, measure, or question on the November ballot of each state jurisdiction here in the Union to let voters decide whether or not underage adolescent marriage should become completely outlawed. Instead, these women have shoved their agenda down everyone’s throats by leaving it up to the state legislators themselves, because they knew that they would not get the popular support that they needed to get these laws passed the right way and the fair way, which was by the voters.
If state legislators shove Ms. Reiss’s agenda down your throat in the form of a law that bans all marriage before the age of eighteen or makes the institution of marriage less available to teenage minors who have legitimate reasons to access it, then each and every one of you need to check your state laws to find out if you can get these laws repealed by popular referendum. My Hive-Blog article titled “Americans Have An Effective Way Of Getting Unfair Laws Regarding Underage Marriage Repealed” explains the procedures on how to make this objective possible in state jurisdictions where this legal option is available.
If you live in a state jurisdiction that does not afford the luxury of a popular referendum to the voters there and a law has been passed either to outlaw underage adolescent marriage altogether or to narrow it down to less accessibility to teenage minors, then you have the right to contact your state legislators to insist that they restore the marriage laws back to what they were previously. If these state legislators ignore you, then you have the right to vote them out of office.
If you live in a state jurisdiction where Ms. Reiss’s agenda has not been shoved down your throat yet in the form of a law banning all underage adolescent marriage, then you need to contact your state legislators to ask them not to let these people from Unchained At Last influence them to deviate from the status quo. If eighteen years old becomes the solid marriageable age throughout our nation with no exceptions under any circumstances, we are going to be living in a much different United States of America from with which we are familiar; and it won’t be good.
There will be more teenage girls on welfare. There will be more abortions occurring in our nation. There will be more prison overcrowding, and there will be more men getting raped in penal facilities. These problems will speed up the spread of H.I.V. and A.I.D.S. There will be more young adult fathers on welfare after they get out of prison after serving time for some frivolous and malicious carnal knowledge conviction that could have been avoided if they had been allowed to marry the teenage mothers of their offspring, because there will be more such men on the sex-offender registry.
Fraidy Reiss does not care about what happens to our nation, and her agenda will destroy our nation in the long run. The fact alone that she has social ties to shady individuals like Hillary Clinton and Chelsea Clinton should serve as a red flag on whether or not to trust her. Now that we are confronted with a coronavirus pandemic that is going to have an adverse impact on our economy, we cannot afford to be playing Russian roulette with our nation’s future any longer. Fraidy Reiss is only concerned about what happens to Fraidy Reiss. She is misusing her tragic marriage and the tragic marriages of others she can dig up from the bottom of the barrel to shove her agenda down the throats of others who don’t want it and don’t need it. Let’s all stand up together against her and her organization and beat them at their game once and for all.
This Article Is Copyright-Protected.