I guess I don't have to remind you that communism and Marxism as an ideology were completely rejected by the end of the 1960s
Not real. Communist politics were still going strong until the end of the 70s. Ever heard of May 68? The 1970s still had a number of national liberation movements. You just don't know what you're talking about, and can't understand that communist thought has multiple tendencies and dimensions to it, as well as having a conflicted but dialectical relationship with anarchist thought.
as by far the most destructive economic and political doctrine that has ever been invented by mankind.
Go masturbate to your little black book of CIA propaganda. Communism has helped people liberate themselves from western colonialism around the entire globe. Marxism is responsible for the modernization of Asia, Africa and South America. It is Marxism, not capitalism, which has brought these people out of the darkness (which Western Imperialism cast them into). So fuck off with this most destructive bullshit.
Did Marxism cause WW1 or WW2? Did Marxism drop nuclear weapons on Japan? Did Marxism enslave Africa to fill its coffers?
Unfortunately, during the 1970s, the Marxist ideology arose from the ashes under the mask of post-modernism, where instead of making the victim out of the working class, the focus is placed on creating allegedly oppressed identity groups (arbitrary formed based on their sexual/gender identity and gender expression as most convenient categories), by the evil oppressors from the "positions of power". The ultimate aim of post-modernists (or neo-Marxists) is to gain power by limiting the freedom of speech, which is achieved through calling any person who provides alternative view to theirs a transphobe, a bigot, and others made-up terms. This strategy has turned out to be particularly effective, because people, out of fear of being declared in such manner, accept playing their game and calling them by their preferred pronouns.
More Peterson-nonsense. You still have his semen on your lips.
POMO and Marxism are, by essence, different and incommensurable. Anyone who has actually bothered to read Derrida, Lacan, Lyotard or the other 'big names' that are categorized under the nomenclature of 'post modernist' immediately understands that the concepts they work with are a break from classical Marxism.
This is not real. Peterson doesn't know what he's talking about. And neither do you.
Post-modernism, at its core, is a deconstructive theory which criticism grand narratives, which Marxism absolutely is (a grand narrative). They want different things. They are different. They aren't some conspiracy. Shut the fuck up.
There is no 'cultural marxist' conspiracy to try and end your little-bitch 'free speech'. Nobody gives a fuck what you have to say anyway, because its fucking ignorant and delusional. Marxists don't need to hide and call people names, because we can actually debate with you. But that's generally useless because you don't listen, don't know what you're talking about, and won't even realize when you've been proven wrong.
RE: great new philosophy tube video