Well, no. I suspect she used the wrong expression, saying "censored": for sure Steemit was not welcoming for her.
Personally I think porn is exploiting my imagination, so I avoid it (my imagination is much better) . But I am subscribing her because of what happened: since when she is here, she got the "anti-welcome package". The first reaction of many was to state she was a different (maybe inferior) kind of poster, and how to segregate her.
Like you enter a party dress in red, and people says, "you are welcome, buuuuuut.... now we need to understand how to deal with people with a red dress".
Is this welcoming? Answer this question: was steemit welcoming ?
I see here people posting about how great is Putin as a leader , and I see no one saying "let's check how to deal with people cheering a dictator". Nobody. They are welcome.
What is the problem with porn ? May anyone show me 150 french people dead because of anal sexx during a metal concert? No. May anyone show me two building in manhattan which were destroyed because of deep throat? No. May anyone show me swingers sending oppositors in prison? No. May anyone show me any journalist killed because she didn't liked pegging? No.
Each and every people which I mentioned was killed was killed because of religion and political issues. Nevertheless, steemit community has NO ISSUES with people which is discussing about religion and/or politics in the radical way.
When it comes to porn, she was just welcomed by people saying "oh, your' welcome. Let's discuss how to segregate you, since we find cheering putin as a dictator is safer for childs than a blowjob".
Technically you are right, steemit is not "censoring" , it is just "unwelcoming" some posters.
Again, my imagination is much better than the average porn (and I have seen a lot), so I stopped to look at it, to focus in something better. Still I don't like people using "unwelcoming" behavior to apply soft censorship.
And I think this unwelcoming behavior is just a kind of soft censorship. Kinda coward censorship , making people uncomfortable and segregated, when everybody else (even notably much worst) is allowed free speech. And then people pretends "here there is no censorship".
When I will see people discussing how to "segregate" discussion which are advocating a dictator, I will agree with the statement "there is no censorship here" . Until people only states how to segregate porn, while allowing the pizzagate ...as it was safe for child , you don't convinced me.
And if anyone thinks porn is not good for child, go in Aleppo, and see what is ACTUALLY not good to childrens , while in the same time people writes how good Putin and Assad are, and NOBODY is discussing "how to segregate them".
Why can't people just say "we were wrong?".
RE: Recap of my weekend (NSFW,uncensored)