The main problem presently is that men have allowed shortsighted women to form public opinions.
The women in charge of education policy sometime in the last century misinterpreted advertising directed at men to provide for them by buying a product as these same advertiser's discriminatory opinion of them for being women. While the intentions of these advertisers that form the opinions or atithesis of the opinions of women is claimed to be known by feminists as the patriarchy they did not and do not represent the whole of society but rather a catering to the reality of being most able to sell a product by harnessing the power of a man's willingness to provide for his wife.
In fact aint-patriarchial propaganda was disseminated by these very same advertising institutions in order to divide the population into more clearly defined marketing audiences. The advertising industry, democratic women voters, and sad excuse for an education system constantly compounds these advertising campaigns from over 50 years ago to recycle them with new taxpayer money and disseminate them as reality to gaslight another generation of democratic voters.
I can tell from your post you are very aware of reality, but reading about an attempted assult on our freedom and porn in the same statement makes me feel like I'm reading the NY times. What is freedom for?
RE: The Rise of the Downtrodden and the Growth of Decrease