This expressive language certainly paints a vivid picture. However, at times the prose felt a bit overwrought, distracting from the narrative rather than enhancing it.
Starting with the opening paragraph, the colorful descriptions like "chuff" and "belly button fluff" felt oddly specific yet meaningless. And the profanity, while attention-grabbing, lent a juvenile tone rather than reading as natural dialogue.
When the trumpet first appears, the extreme horror and confusion came across as histrionic. Jumping to visions of "hairy crevices" and accusing Bulgarians stretched credulity. The emotions seemed out of proportion to the situation.
The mocking speculation about the instrument being a "brass-arse-inspector" or "penis receptacle" also played as crass rather than comical. And the melodramatic visions of caverns and hellish creatures felt like try-hard edginess.
Finally, the ending resolved sweetly with the revelation that it's just the child's new trumpet. However, the father's thinly-veiled disappointment at her lack of interest in guitars rang sour. His perspective came across as curmudgeonly and close-minded, out of sync with the family's innocent joy.
Overall, the story contained interesting seeds of humor and intrigue, but the execution overwhelmed the subtler aspects. Reining in some of the more excessive asides could allow the central narrative to shine through. Sometimes less is more when crafting fiction - restraint and nuance often serve better than hyperbole.
RE: Parp