"do you believe no scientist in the world would attempt to interpret data in a way that their paid to do, despite of how unethical that is?"
97% of scientists agree with whoever pays them. Just like cops, lawyers, judges, and politicians. I clearly don't believe that 'no scientists' do actual science. This post is exactly that, Professors Emeritus pointing out demonstrable facts. Actual scientific method in action.
"...my city's average temperature rising by 10 degrees in the summer over the last 20 years..."
What makes you think that is the case? Do you have records you have collected for the last 20 years that show that happening? No, you don't. You have been told that happened by someone else. Consider who told you that, and why they are telling you that. Note that the AGW scam is on track to produce hundreds of trillions of dollars of profit to the scammers by 2050. That's a lot of incentive to lie.
"McKinsey and Company estimated the Net Zero transition would cost about
$9.2 trillion per year and $275 trillion between 2021 and 2050."
--Lindzen and Happer (2025)
There are known consequences of paving locales. It's called the 'urban heat island effect'. You can ascertain the reality of this effect yourself, and you can even quantify it scientifically if you use appropriate tools and carefully document the results, which is the scientific method. But, you don't need to do that to confirm it's an actual, real effect. You just have to go from an urban environment where everything is paved or concrete structures to outside that urban environment to a forested area of a large enough extent. You can feel that the temperature has declined. If you don't trust your physical senses, you simply need a thermometer that you use to show the temperature in a city and in a forest.
"...it is clearly safe to assume these are actually just thousands of local events instead which somehow never add up to something bigger and never influence each other. clearly, the amazon forest disappearing has no effect anywhere else..."
You have to be careful with your tongue stuck so hard in cheek, because you will bite it if you're careless. I will suggest to you that you make direct statements of what you feel are facts, rather than resorting to ad homs, mockery, and innuendo, because then you become able to actually demonstrate what is demonstrably true, and can detect any errant, non-factual claims you might have been misled by.
Rapine misdevelopment by multinational corporations, such as profit from laying waste to the Amazon, isn't the climate. Dumping chemical pollution into our environment isn't CO2 creating 'global boiling' (to quote UN Secretary-General António Guterres). These are actual dangers that the AGW scam is concealing, real harmful environmental damage that we can put an end to if we notice them and make the effort to stop them from happening - and the multinational corporations hide these things by trumpeting the fake AGW scam that good people are bamboozled by so that they never take action to stop the real damage that is ongoing.
The destruction of the Amazon, of natural environments everywhere, isn't being caused by .04% of the atmosphere (that human beings release 3% of), CO2. It's being caused by big ag corporations illegally logging, burning, and converting to pasture so billionaires can run beef cattle, by Bayer and Archer Daniels Midland dousing our food in toxic biocides, and drenching pristine ecosystems in glyphosate. Those are real environmental destruction going on, and that is what the AGW scam is hiding from people that care about life and our environment, so that we don't do anything to stop it, but instead pay taxes to appease sky gods.
Please be more directly factual with your criticism so that I can learn from you. If I am wrong about something I want you to prove it - not make vaguely mocking comments that can't be demonstrated are factually correct or not. The reason you don't make specific claims is because you don't have actual observations of facts you can back up, and that makes your criticism useless to me.
Make useful claims to prove me wrong, so I can change my mind and become right by agreeing with facts you can prove, please. Also, self-voting is contrary to the entire purpose of social media. I'd have upvoted you if you hadn't upvoted yourself.
Thanks!
RE: Physics Disproves Anthropogenic Global Warming Scam