The issue of alimony is truly a litmus issue. You can easily distinguish between those who want equality and those who want privilege by looking at their attitudes about alimony.
The alimony mentioned in the alimony discussion is not alimony paid for the child. I don't think anyone will have a problem here. If you have children, you will take care of them, if you do not want to take care of them, you will not.
The issue here is that the man is forced to pay alimony to the woman when there are no children. There is no moral justification for this. This issue has nothing to do with whether women have economic freedom or not. It is very immoral to divorce someone and demand property at the same time.
The thing that should be is simple actually: in case of divorce, the property acquired during the marriage should be shared equally, and the parties should not have any claims on each other after that. however, if there is a child, there may be a financial relationship for the expenditures of the child, in which case all expenditures must be documented. (not the method of alimony paid every month like salary, but the method of sending the receipts of the expenditures to the other party and sharing the expenditure 50/50 up to a certain limit)