The pattern I saw was that the missing variable was the number one less than the first one indicated. 8(x7)=56, 7(x6)=42. With that reasoning, 3(x2)=6.
The pattern I saw was that the missing variable was the number one less than the first one indicated. 8(x7)=56, 7(x6)=42. With that reasoning, 3(x2)=6.
RE: mathematics challenge: olny for geniuses #3