Now I see:
You call exponential growth superlinear. That's very confusing. Why not use words people understand?
And the opposite of what is needed. Inverse exponential rewards – sublinear as you would call it - is needed to help plankton accounts along:
And would reflect real live articles better. Articles don't become exponentially better. Quite the opposite they get closer and closer to perfect without reaching it.
RE: Ned Scott and @theoretical of Steemit Explore Oracles on Steem