i totaly agree with your words, exept the last sentens:
So let us focus on starting a automobile company in Nepal instead of decreasing tax of imported goods.
- nepal have only one of the most needed resources to produce cars: water. al other resorces have to be importet, and without a deepwater port or even a traintrack would be expansive.
- who is willing to invest the millions of dolars, or about wich conditions, to a corrupt and nepotistic econommy, where a good legal certainty hardely can be found.
my recomodation is to start other industris where much less investitions ar needed like forestry and different kind of wooddworks, production of waterturbines and pipes, pressurecookers...
the high taxes at luxury goods (what means even a tv) is in my oppinion the best and fairest way to finance the gov. let pay the taxes by the wealthy!
RE: Automobiles in Nepal : Why 250% tax is good ?