I'm every bit in favor of protecting children. If I were to see a suspicious older man my father's age pulling a 6-year-old girl into his car, you better believe that I'd go running to that little girl's rescue. If I were too far away from the scene of the crime to stop it, I'd quickly be getting on my cell phone to report it to the police.
Nevertheless, every time I go on YouTube, it seems that these self-proclaimed child advocates get more and more mentally unhinged than before with their videos. What is their obsession with cross-generational teenage sex?
I understand that parents don't send their teenage offspring to school to have sex with the faculty. I understand that teachers have a call of duty not to intermingle with their students in a sexual manner. I understand that any teacher who does have sex with an underage student should be removed from his or her position as an educator.
What I don't understand is why it is that whenever a schoolteacher has a consensual relationship with a teenager, these self-proclaimed child advocates insist that that schoolteacher is a pedophile and a child molester. There is a world of a difference between a teenager having a willing tryst with his or her schoolteacher and a deviant adult sexually molesting a small, prepubescent child (e.g. 7 or 8 years old).
You cannot trust these self-proclaimed child advocates or even place any stock into anything they say anymore. At the same time, I cannot figure out why none of them are doing anything to reform the inheritance laws in the United States.
Real cases of child abuse and child molestation are not being reported simply because the perpetrators are weaponizing parental testamentary freedom to scare their victims out of turning them in to the authorities. As punitive of a state jurisdiction as Florida is regarding their child-sexual-abuse laws, you would think that they would now have forced heirship laws similarly to those of Louisiana and Puerto Rico; but they don't.
1. A Former Schoolteacher Not A Pedophile
I came across this one video on YouTube that shows a parole hearing in Iowa of this one former schoolteacher named Stefanie Regine Kelsey who had served two years behind bars for having sexual intercourse with a student from the time that he was 14 years old to the time that he was 15 years old. Before I comment on it herein, I would like you to watch the video from beginning to end. It'll definitely grab your undivided attention.
A Sensationalistic Take On An Affair Between A Former Teacher And Her Teenage Student
The comments section of this same video had its usual love fest of self-appointed psychiatrists and self-proclaimed child advocates who believe that there's no difference between a teenager and a toddler. However, what stood out the most was the narrator of this video, YouTuber Mandoo|Channel Two ("YouTuber Mandoo), who presented himself as what can best be described as a mentally unhinged conspiracy theorist who looked as though he was on dope throughout his entire narrative.
Now, don't get me wrong. I listened to the entire victims impact statement, and I did hear what sounded like the alleged victim claiming that Ms. Kelsey forced herself upon him at the onset of the sexual involvement. I figure that if boys in their early-to-middle teenage years can suffer psychological trauma at the hands of girls the same age sexually harassing them, then it's possible that they could be harmed in a sexual encounter with an older woman if it were an unpleasant one.
Nevertheless, these are the problems that I continue to have with the victims impact statement from the alleged victim's grandmother. The teenage boy made no effort to stop the sexual relationship. In fact, he even connived with Ms. Kelsey to ensure that nobody found out about their sexual involvement with each other. If he were a true victim, I would think that he would have been trying every way to break it off with this woman; but he didn't.
The alleged victim's grandmother kept calling Ms. Kelsey a pedophile throughout the victims impact statement. However, her accusation in that respect could constitute defamation of character in a civil court of law inasmuch as the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ("DSM-5") specifies that pedophilia is the sexual attraction of someone over 16 years of age toward a prepubescent child 5 or more years their junior.
An adult woman having sex with a 14-year-old boy doesn't qualify her to be a pedophile, because he's too old to be a prospective object of pedophilia, for a lack of a better term. In watching the video above, anyone could see the grandmother's lack of literacy in that she referred to her grandson as a predatory 14-year-old boy. In other words, she was labeling him as the perpetrator instead of Ms. Kelsey.
The grandmother obviously doesn't know what the specific definition is of the adjective "predatory," and that could explain why she doesn't have the proper command of facts to determine who is and is not a pedophile. Moreover, to the best of my knowledge, she is not a psychiatrist. Therefore, she's practicing psychiatry without a medical license, and that is a crime. I don't believe that the Iowa Parole Board was at all impressed with the alleged victim's grandmother.
Now, I'm not here to claim that Ms. Kelsey is a poster child for good behavior. From watching the video, I was clearly able to see that she is not the perfect wife or the perfect parent; and she's definitely not the perfect schoolteacher. This woman undoubtedly has issues. However, I would never go to the extremities of branding her to be a pedophile or a child molester.
What makes the above video sensationalistic in nature is because YouTuber Mandoo stresses that Ms. Kelsey was a special education teacher. Point well taken. However, the alleged victim was never her student. In fact, she didn't really have any power over him.
YouTuber Mandoo kept referring to Ms. Kelsey as a CHOMO. Give me a break. It's not as though she sexually penetrated a 2-year-old toddler with her fingers. She actually saved a 12- or 13-year-old girl from becoming needlessly pregnant by this alleged male teenage victim by distracting him from girls his own age.
Teenage sex is not child molestation no matter how YouTuber Mandoo tries to twist it. Grooming is not rape. It is also debatable whether Ms. Kelsey actually groomed her alleged teenage victim. There needs to be a high bar set to prove something like that in a court of law.
What immediately comes to mind is the chomo hypocrisy. A good example in that regard is the fact that boys as young as 15 years old are currently being locked up with hardened career criminals in adult prisons throughout the United States. Do these adult convicts protect these boys in prison? Of course not. They rape them.
I find it hypocritical that society and the law here in the United States are more concerned about teenage hedonists having secret affairs with their female teachers than they are about underage boys getting brutally raped in adult prisons. These underage boys who are being sexually brutalized in adult prisons may even be serving time for crimes they didn't commit.
2. The Iowa Parole Board's Decision Regarding Stefanie Regine Kelsey
In the video above, YouTuber Mandoo continues to whine about how he feels that the Iowa Parole Board coddled Stefanie Regine Kelsey by giving her parole after only serving two years behind bars. I can assure him that her parole and her sex-offender-registration requirements will not be a walk in the park for however long she has to do so. She will be under so much scrutiny that she may even wish that she was going back to prison.
If Ms. Kelsey makes even one mistake in reporting important life and career changes to her parole officer, she could be punished for it in the form of additional prison time. If she is even one day late in registering when she is supposed to do so, it could be hazardous for her.
These coming years for Ms. Kelsey are going to be extremely bumpy. If YouTuber Mandoo wants to accuse someone of getting off easy for doing the same thing that Ms. Kelsey did, even worse, he needs to look at the case of Kaitlyn Grimley in the Commonwealth of Virginia. In his video below, Norman Michael Achin explains how the criminal court treated her after she got arrested for having sex with more than one underage student of hers. Her alleged victims were 13- and 14-year-old boys.
Kaitlyn Grimley Got A Slap On The Wrist For Having Sex With 13- And 14-Year-Old Students
Now, I later find out that the Commonwealth Attorney, which is a District Attorney in the Commonwealth of Virginia, changed the ages of Ms. Grimley's alleged victims from 13 and 14 years old to being over 16 years old of age. Mr. Achin found this practice baffling, but it is actually quite common among prosecutors in the United States. In his YouTube video, Ahmad Jamal Blakemore explains how prosecutors can change the age of a victim in a sex case upon offering a plea deal.
My response to the Iowa Parole Board's decision to grant parole to Ms. Kelsey is that they did not go easy on her at all despite what YouTuber Mandoo may believe. I don't believe that they even think that they went easy on her either.
Self-proclaimed child advocates like YouTuber Mandoo are rewriting the definition of pedophilia in defiance of the actual definition that appears in the DSM-5 insofar as they are turning it into a conspiracy theory. If YouTuber Mandoo really wants to do a story about teenage boys being savagely abused in a sexual manner, he needs to do a video about 15-year-old boys who are incarcerated with adult men that are hardened criminals and brutally gang-raped. Then he would be pursuing a noble cause.
The United States has the most archaic statutory-rape laws in the world, and the only purpose they serve is to line the pockets of those who control the prison-industrial complex. In other nations, the story about Ms. Kelsey wouldn't have received any attention from the press or the media or the digital public at large.
Now, I'm not claiming that Ms. Kelsey has made the wisest decisions in her life. However, I don't feel that it does justice to equate her to monsters like Jesse Timmendequas, Donald James Smith, Joseph Duncan III, the late John Couey, or Kenneth Parnell, just to name a few notorious child molesters who raped and murdered prepubescent children. She's not a child predator in the classic sense.
3. The Hotheaded Stupidity And Insanity Of Self-Proclaimed Child Advocates
I came across two videos on YouTube in which Steven Robert Whitsett exposes a fanatical self-proclaimed child advocate named Brittni De La Mora who delivered a false narrative that Germany was trying to decriminalize child pornography. Throughout her spiel, anyone can clearly see that she is not educated on the proper definitions of terms like pedophilia, child molestation, and the likes. Below are the videos.
Brittni De La Mora Gets Carried Away With Her Narrative About Child Pornography Laws In Germany
One very interesting point that a YouTuber by the user name of Ninja1k-h3q makes in the comments section of this video is that he posts:
AMERICAN CONTRADICTION: We will charge and convict a kid ( Charged as Adults) as low as 12 years old for Murder, but yet, If a 19 year old has sex or takes pictures of the same 12 year Old, they Label them as Sex Offenders (often Pedophiles) and impose VERY Lengthy Prison Sentences .....AND put them on Registries forever!
How is this 12 Year old, old enough, to face life sentences (as an adult) and yet not be considered "ADULT" enough to have sex???? The USA is the Land of Ignorance!
What it is is that law-enforcement officials want to have their cake and eat it too. However, Americans are starting to see right through their nonsense.
Brittni De La Mora Spews Her Pedophile-Panic Propaganda To The World
I'm not saying that Ms. De La Mora is an evil person for having the kinds of opinions she does. She is merely an ill-informed person who allows her emotions to dictate her overall viewpoint of matters involving sex laws throughout the world.
Unlike YouTuber Mandoo, she doesn't look like a peeping tom who goes following little girls into dressing rooms, but one cannot overlook the fact that she used to capitalize on letting the good times roll whenever a camera rolled. Whether she chooses to be religious is her choice, but she cannot deny that her religious convictions have a biased impact on the way she approaches the topic of sex laws and pornography laws.
What Mr. Whitsett needs to do is e-mail Ms. De La Mora a link to the online publication titled The Paradox of Statutory Rape by Russell L. Christopher and Kathryn Hope Christopher so that she can read it from beginning to end and educate herself on the real facts behind American statutory-rape laws from a bird's eye view. She has a much sugarcoated perspective of teenage sexuality insofar as she sees everything with tunnel vision.
Ms. De La Mora doesn't feel that a girl is old enough to consent to sexual relations with an adult man when she is 12 years old. I'm not encouraging any preteen to have sex that young. However, what I find so outrageous is that here in the United States, society and the law appear to go much harsher on 19- and 20-year-old men who may have shared intimacy with a precocious 12-year-old girl than they do on a 13-year-old boy who brutally rapes a girl that age.
A good example of what I'm explaining is back in the 2000s in Lincoln, Nebraska, a 12-year-old girl named Crystal Guyer fell in love with a 20-year-old man named Matt Koso whom she had known most of her life. She initiated the sex with him. She eventually became pregnant with his baby, and they both went down to Hiawatha, Kansas to get legally married when she was 14 years old and Mr. Koso was 22 years old.
Nonetheless, the Nebraska Attorney General, Jon Bruning, became dead set on destroying Mr. Koso's life after he got wind of the marriage. Mr. Bruning went as far as slandering Mr. Koso by accusing him of being a pedophile. Afterwards, Mr. Koso categorically denied that he was one, which was his right.
Mr. Bruning aggressively went through every step he could to ensure that Mr. Koso served prison time. Crystal Guyer-Koso voiced her outrage at Mr. Bruning and accused him of merely exploiting her to further his own political career, and she was right. Mr. Bruning didn't really care about her or about any other girl her age. Mr. Bruning successfully ruined Mr. Koso and Ms. Guyer-Koso's lives.
Now when you take that whole string of events and you take into consideration that a 12- or 13-year-old nameless boy was never even arrested for brutally raping the late Aubreigh Wyatt in 2022 when she was 12 years old, how can anyone believe that the United States has an ethical criminal justice system? It's like a set of double standards that law-enforcement officials and court officials apply to these sex-related cases here in the so-called land of milk and honey.
4. Final Thoughts
I do not condone middle-school or high-school teachers having affairs with their students. At the same time, I cannot pretend that a 14-year-old boy still believes in the tooth fairy and watches Sesame Street on a regular basis. There's this thing called reality, and I don't believe that Brittni De La Mora and YouTuber Mandoo are grounded in it.
Mentally unhinged and fanatical self-proclaimed child advocates are attempting to turn the United States and the rest of the planet into a make-believe world of age-appropriate perfection and wholesome purity. They are conspiracy theorists at best; and people need to push back against this trend, because it is harming us more than it is benefiting us as a whole.
Until laws and attitudes regarding teenage sexuality change here in the United States, I'm going to keep on voicing my opinions and my findings on this writing platform. I've gotten backlash for it, but it hasn't stopped me. In fact, it has made me feel more determined to put up a fight than I was when I published my first article here back in 2017.
Join me in my mission. I'm your Space Captain reporting to you.
This article is copyright-protected.