People love to highlight that only 2 to 10% of all rape accusations are FALSE. So that means 90 to 98% of rape accusations are presumed to be TRUE. But you have to remember, these people are factoring in REPORTED rapes and UNREPORTED rapes. The first problem has to deal with UNREPORTED rapes. If a woman does not report a rape, then it’s like that alleged rape never took place because she cannot actually prove it took place technically or legally. There is no evidence to back up her claim. So how can you add in UNREPORTED rapes into the 2 to 10% FALSE rape accusation stat? The second problem with the 2 to 10% FALSE rape stat has to deal with the REPORTED rapes. Once again, 2 to 10% are alleged to be FALSE meaning 90 to 98% are presumed to be TRUE, but out of the REPORTED rapes, only 31% are actually REPORTED. So these 90 to 98% alleged TRUE rapes, only 31% are REPORTED. Out of these 90 to 98% alleged TRUE rapes, only 5.7% of these alleged rapists are arrested. Out of these 90 to 98% alleged TRUE rapes, only 1.1% of them are referred to the prosecutor’s office. And finally out of these 90 to 98% alleged TRUE rapes, only 1% of them produce a conviction.
Understand, these numbers come straight out of the Washington Post, not some random ass blog online that I found. But still, out of all of these 90 to 98% alleged TRUE rapes that supposedly take place, only 1.1% of them sent to the prosecutor’s office and 1% are lead to a conviction meaning, 99 out of 100 men are NOT convicted of rape. Then once again, why in the hell are men made to feel shame for trying to highlight false rape claims when the data clearly states that damn near all of these REPORTED rape claims are bs that even the prosecutor can’t take to court.
click HERE to read more...