I heard that STEEM's curatorial model has to be changed

I heard that STEEM's curatorial model has to be changed:

I heard that STEEM's curatorial model has to be changed from 75/25 to 50/50.
Personally, I am not agree that a 50/50 curation model .
But I am agree , should give more powers to the whales .
So I suggest it should change to the following way...
Curation model still is 75/25.
But the curator's 25% allocation can take a curve allocation.
In other words, the curator still scores 25% in total,
but proportion is not horizontal line, (black line as shown)
proportion can change to curve line, (pictured red line)
its mean is , if voter use more vote power, he can get more reward (his rewardwill add).
This can also inspire the whales to use higher voting rights.

I think the fork can in 1/3 of the place,
That is,
If the voter's power is less than 1/3, the reward will be reduced.
If the voter's power is higher than 1/3, the reward will increase.

Original curation distribution ratio: horizontal line
Proposed curaration ratio: curve line

聽說STEEM的策展模型要有所改變:

聽說STEEM的策展模型要由75/25變為50/50.
就个人而言，我不同意50/50的策展模型。
但我同意，应该赋予鲸鱼更多的权力。
所以我建议它应该改为以下方式......
策展模型仍然是75/25。
但策展人的25％分配可以进行曲线分配。
换句话说，策展人仍然占总数的25％，
但比例不是水平线，（如图所示的黑线）
比例可以变为曲线，（如图红线所示）
它的意思是，如果选民使用更多的投票权，他可以得到更多的奖励（他的奖励将增加）。
这也可以激发鲸鱼使用更高的投票权。

我认为叉子可以在1/3的位置，
那是，
如果选民的权力小于1/3，则奖励将减少。
如果选民的权力高于1/3，则奖励将增加。

原始管理分配比例：水平线
拟议的评价比例：曲线