I certainly dissagree with Peterson on a lot of things, but I think that saying there are absolutely no problems with far-left thinking and that it has receeded into obscurity is simply not true. De-platforming is a massive harm to our discourse within universities and I think the most charitable interpretation of his goals would be to stop this kind of thinking. Conversation is truly the only tool we have to progress in society, and once that is outlawed, the only option left is violence.
I think that the focus on peterson has been largely overblown in so many ways, and that his messages are vanilla and juvenile at best, and it is unfortunate that it drives young people towards right leaning ideologies, but that perhaps is only true because of any true centrist options in our society.
RE: The Peterson fallacy or how the world is not served by attacking a beaten enemy