«From My Point Of View»

Posts with rewards set to burn still pay curators.

Only author rewards are burned.

If you think this type of content should be eligible for author rewards, then «click» here.

Thanks for your support.

Ok, I reckon 52 short MeMe posts are enough to make a small pause and rant a bit longer. Yeah, definitely 52 is a high enough number to tell some things in a more clear, loud and eloquently fashion. Especially if it's about answering some questions that have suddenly become somewhat popular in the community of our "social network" on the blockchain.

So, this post is basically intended to respond to some of the elements raised in the latest and most recent posts of four HiRep users on a topic that has suddenly become somewhat redundant lately. And I say redundant, because at least I and a few others here have been publishing content on this topic for years without anyone paying attention to us for the simple fact that we don't have a bigass fat HP stake to upvote comments.

The Hive users whose posts I intend to respond to with this article correspond to:

And from their post, to which this article today is a response, all of them more or less deal with the same subject. A subject that requires attention and solutions asap.

But just so you won't get confused by selecting the wrong post of them if you only clicked on their username, since these users are prolific authors and publish several posts a day. Below I'll guide you through the right selection by sharing the pictures that illustrate their post in question to which this article is responding.

In the same order in which these users have been mentioned:

Alright, let's start then with the answers and my eloquent soliloquy:

First of all, in my opinion, based on my point of view and how I see things. All those who are called community helpers, community moderators, and community administrators. They all are no more than a bunch of sycophants, asskissers and starving to death lambucios. Just like the so-called project leaders or creators, founders and owners of such communities, they are nothing more than a gang of opportunists, parasites and leeches in its great majority within the ecosystem.
The former actually deserve to be demonetized for their roles as sycophants, asskissers and starving to death lambucios for letting themselves be fooled and deceived by the second when their greedy rules suddenly change and the former are no longer useful for their purposes of effortless enrichment. And the second deserve to be instantly eliminated and defenestrated from the very moment in which their delusions of grandeur make them believe they have already reached the pinnacle of fame, authority and influence. Both, useless and fruitless pursuers of mirages. Everyone should work only by themselves and exclusively for themselves.
Because for me, there's simply no such thing as altruism in the online world. Much less on the blockchain, where money or some kind of monetary gain is the true motivator for any action. After all, they are all nothing more than illustrious strangers to each other. If not, ask to each of these community helpers, community moderators, and community administrators why the hell do they have to receive higher monetary rewards than the authors of the posts they are promoting to be upvoted? Yeah, they all wrongly call themselves "content curators" ¡WTF!
On other hand, in my opinion, there shouldn't exist any kind of HP delegations within the ecosystem. At least not in one that calls itself a "social network" and whose name already infers and implies organic, conscious, and in-person interaction among its members. So, in my opinion, no one should earn a single cent if they don't engage and act completely organically, consciously, and in-person in all their interactions or as much as their capital allows it using it only by themselves. If not, don't call this a "social network" and call this thing something else.
In a true "social network", «SOCIAL», there cannot and should not exist any kind of automation. So nothing of voting trails, no voting guilds, no place for systematic cronyism, no clubs of exalted nepotists nor any of that automated crap. Every interaction must be carried out in an organic, conscious and actively personal manner. At least if we expect to receive some reward for our attention, time and dedicated effort. It shouldn't be plausible or sustainable to receive rewards in any way other than manual. No bots, no voting services and no more blind rewards.
And those who call themselves investors, well, let them invest. But if they intend to increase their capital and obtain a big ROI, then let them work and suck it up like the rest of us work and suck it up. Manually, organically, consciously and in-person as everyone else. ¿What the hell is that of wanting earn rewards without reading or consuming what they vote for? Or for that matter, expecting to earn big rewards only according their investment and high stake without posting anything? ¡Get out of here fucker!

Or you put all your investment into HBD savings and settle for 15% in annual interest earnings. Or you power up and convert all that capital into HP to vote and fairly distribute the tokens among the community members whose content you actually have read, consumed, digested and enjoyed in person, organically and manually like the rest of us conscious and decent people do. Because ¿Why should money by itself have greater privileges than those who produce that money?

Well, I suspect I've fallen short in my responses. But I think at some point I lost track of the entirety of what I wanted to address, highlight, and respond to in this post. And perhaps it's better that it happened this way to conclude this post right here and not make it much longer. Because then, probably no one will have the patience to read and digest it in its entirety. Although in any case, I imagine you already understood what was the main drift and catched where this all was going.

Thus don't worry. If I forgot to cover something important today, I'll get back to it, highlight it, and break it down in greater detail in a future post. Probably the next Tuesday, April 8th after 3:00 PM UTC. So, I'll sign off for now. But not without leaving you before with an Ad Hoc tune here to help you reflect on what I've written so far.