RE: RE: GIT feature branches vs. Continuous Integration (CI) - Improve your software development

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: GIT feature branches vs. Continuous Integration (CI) - Improve your software development

View the full context

RE: GIT feature branches vs. Continuous Integration (CI) - Improve your software development

jedibofink(28)

Published in

#programming

Words

0

Reading

0 min

Listen

Play

Tuesday, October 10, 2017 6:44 PM

Hi, good post, I assume the "clean" Fowler setup is the same as trunk based development? I do agree that the compromise you describe is a reasonable thing to do but there is also the nagging thought that true CI needs frequent integration on a main branch. I heard Nicole Forsgren at Code-Conf and she said that her research points to trunk based development as one of the practices that creates high performing software companies. http://www.code-conf.com/speakers/?tag=sthlm&scrollto=nforsgren

programming

Tuesday, October 10, 2017 6:44 PM

jedibofink(28)

via steemit

This post was published via steemit. Ecency is not the originator or editor of this content and displays it for discovery purposes only.

$ 0.071

1