Well... one things certain. If we want to maintain Hive as a decentralized censorship free (resistant?) solution... we need to have whistleblowers who are more interested in the truth than the crypto that slides nicely into their pockets.
I don’t know what to think about any of this but there are bread crumbs to follow and I hope their are bright brains following them to find answers.
Personally, my goal is to do my utmost to create a free, friendly, and fair (and safe!) digital environment to continue inviting my friends, family, and famous to.
There’s growing pains here on Hive... certainly there is. And we are only as good as the people within our community and the processes we implement.
Hive has substantial improvements to make on how it determines and processes its red flags. Black Listing needs much more work as it’s current implementation is centralized and unfriendly.
What if we were to all make use of our DPOS to vote on itemized case by case security breaches?
We have all decided to go down the road of decentralization... why not go all the way? Let’s give the DPOS system a real run for its money. Using our powered up Hive to ensure the right decisions are made.
Couldn’t Black List cases be first logged for vote and determination first? And what, exactly, does it mean to be black listed? Shouldn’t their be specified and gradual weight factored into that system?
Whatever the case... centralizing the policing of Hive is a mistake especially if we are decided that we want to market ourselves as a solution to centralization and censorship. If we are going to continue to aspire to a better more evolved way to human through social media... then we had absolutely better hold ourselves and our processes to a higher standard. @hivewatchers
RE: Hive Owned By Companies and HiveWatchers - How They Like To Play