I choose to associate with people of my own race, sex, color, beliefs, religion and political party not because it's white privilege but because every race does the exact same thing and discrimination and tribalism is an important part of human existence.
The question was a simple yes or no, you didn't justify it with logic, you simply made it a matter of importance, and what you made it of importance was that you associate with people of your own sex, color, beliefs, race (isn't that color?) color, religion and race, because it's important, when the question was simply:
I can arrange to be in the company of people of my own race most of the time, IE: I am part of a MAJORITY.
Yes or no. Yes
Are you part of the majority in some certain neighborhoods, nope, but therein is the point you say and to which I only have to point that those neighborhoods cannot arrange to be in the company of their own race most of the time, from the law, to the health, to the education, to the finances, to the work, to the services and products all dominated by and large outside black people, or latino, the reality is that white has dominion of Law/Justice Health/Education Money/Work and Water and Electric. Then even your black neighborhood yes, you cannot be in the company of your own people most of the time, regardless of how you arrange it.
Yup, don't get followed because I don't dress like a thug, white trash or have tattoos all over my body. Those people get followed around a store because they fit the profile of a shop lifter more than someone that is well groomed and dressed.
Again you missed the point my friend, you chose simply to address that regardless of dress and in spite of it people are going to suspect people simply and Only because of the skin color and harassed and followed and treated as a suspect.
Yes, because white European ancestry are the majority in my area and America. If I moved to China, Afica or India I expect to see those races dominating television.
What a load of hogwash. It's not Television. It's more specific than Television.
White Glory History vs Black Slavery Inception. It's not TELEVISION, it doesn't mention TELEVISION.
Umm, like white paper and glue? Don't even know how to respond this one.
Yes, because see above, you equate TELEVISION to national heritage and "civilization" which both speak only of white people, all the way from ancient times when the ancient greeks stole their philosophy, mathematics and logic/reasoning by conquest from the arab people.
When they are speaking of "sure that my children are given curricular materials that testify to the existence of their race" you equate that to Glue and White Paper.. Why even address the Gian Elephant in the Room.
My friend, you are either being obtuse on purpose or on accident. The reality is that if you had black children you would answer NO.
I can find hundreds of different types of music, food and hairstyles at each of these stores. I'm sorry if you live in Antarctica and expected to see penguin and kill whale on the menu but it's all about supply and demand not racism.
It's the music my race represented, so black people represent promiscousness, impulsive, and thuggery, classic trio to attest to a specific question. While the music of white people is represented by "freedom, love, happiness" which there is a plethora in all music shops, but find me one Blackalicious or other independent artist in a shop, YOU-CANNOT, the mainstream you find is Thuggery, Fuck Bitches, Blow Money in whatever order!
I can count on my dress, grooming, work history and credit score to show that I'm financially responsible.
Again the question is avoiding the fact that simply being Black impacts economic decisions. Not only you can't get credit, but even if you have Great Credit, Great Work History, Impeccable Dressed and Spit-shined Smile, simply being black will negate all of that. The truth is that industry is owned by White America, the Banks are owned by White Europe along with the rest of the worlds Incorporated Governments. The same people that don't teach white kids about https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080222054649AA4NdSb# are still in charge and have been in charge, and it wasn't always about race.
http://www.macquirelatory.com/First%20Black%20President.htm
It's still about the hidden interests of the Bankers and the Vatican and the Crown which aim to profit by pitting white against black, one failed decade after another failed decade of seeking to maintain the segregation and incite a war.
The points above are both salient and well worth considering and cannot be "logic" away. They are pertained to certain factors that amount to nothing short of systemic discrimination.
Dwinblood tried to make cops shooting black people disproportionately more than white people as the consequence of black culture which likewise here yo spoke amply on while positing yourself Presentable, Good Debtor, etc etc. and paint an embarrassing situation of Systemic Discrimination as the casualty of necessity and personal choice and you won't have ANY chance in hell at healing the trauma that underlines this Fake Inception of a many people at the hands of their Saviors.
I think you get the picture of what I'm saying. This teach seems more interesting in causing psychology problems in these students instead of actually explaining why racism, prejudices, tribalism are part of human nature and why it might not always be a bad thing like being prejudice against dating the same sex.
Race implications are brainwashing, because gosh forbid there was any such Systemic Racism especially that wasn't justified by proclaiming it's the same as prejudice against dating the same sex.
Fuck that nonsense that has Zilch logic, Zilch reasoning and is a fundamental fail on the principle that genetically we all are Africans and the continuation of this thought that White Justice and Black Justice, White Credit and Black Credit has any legitimacy it will be Black because I will not clamor at the Stories of Deceivers, Conquerors, Thieves, Rapists, Liars, and Enslavers and will heed the caution of the underdog, the advice of the suppressed.
RE: Students offered extra credit to determine their level of ‘white privilege’