First and foremost, whoever leaked the preliminary majority ruling should be punished. To my knowledge this has not happened before in American history.
More importantly, people really have to understand what the Supreme Court is supposed to be. This is something that you should have learned in middle school; but, I guess a lot of people forgot.
It's nonsensical to refer to this preliminary ruling as anti-Democratic. Simply put, Roe v Wade was anti-Democratic itself. The state of Texas wouldn't have voted in favor of abortion rights in 1973. A small group of people overruled the majority back then and they might be overruling the majority now.
What's more, being anti-Democratic is the entire freaking point of the Supreme Court. We're a Democratic Republic. That means that majorities elect representatives, which is the democratic part, while the Constitution and the Court upholds the rule of law for all people. If the court were democratic it would be useless.
It wasn't democracy that prevented homosexual marriage. People voted for those restrictions and the Court overruled it. That was anti-Democratic and I'm willing to bet that literally zero people who are using that rhetoric now raised a single concern about that ruling.
At this moment, I don't care where anyone stands on the issue of abortion. Access can be and has been provided and restricted via various mechanisms throughout history. People are showing once again that they don't understand the mechanisms and why they're in place.
There are valid conversations to be had about the validity of the Roe v Wade decision and this upcoming ruling. Whether or not the rulings are democratic isn't a valid discussion to have. Talk about what the Constitution actually says.