Thanks! Good to hear from you. Lately, I've been thinking a lot about this. I have come to recognize that gravity is not the end-all-be-all of how the universe functions, but that even it is the result of this pressure variation between vacuums and infinite masses. This brings it more mathematically to the realm of 0=∞, or some variation thereof that indicates the mirror aspect of it. I've been going through calculus again, looking at limits and notice that every time a 0/0 arises, there is the potential to actually interpret this to be ∞/∞, and to interpret both to actually have the real answer of =1. In cases where a limit is approached from both the negative and the positive direction, it is always possible to interpret that they actually converge "half way" between 0 and ∞, i.e. at ∞/2. This is another way of saying they converge where +∞ and -∞ meet. Rather than saying that there is no limit, or doing some math where the value the limit approaches "doesn't count" to extract that point where the function has "no limit", it is possible to say that its limit exists. I believe there is something substantial mathematically in relating 0 and ∞ in this way, or a closely related way, that "closes" math so that it fully encompasses all possibilities rather than being open (approaching infinity in all directions but not "wrapping back around").
It turns what is a plane into, in a way, a sphere where what we normally look at is so flat that it is best understood as a plane but where, in reality, even the x-y plane acts as a three-dimensional sphere when -x and +x connect at ∞ and -y and +y connect at ∞. The labeling of one as "negative" and the other as "positive" is arbitrary in the same way as the labeling of one as "zero" and the other as "infinity" as arbitrary. Both are the other, just looked at from different angles.
There's a lot to it, and math is extremely vast, to test whether or not this "clears things up" when it is fully grasped. But I do believe very strongly that this would make sense and has the potential to change our understanding of what zero and infinity are in terms of actual mathematical equations and their interpretations therein.
Also, this would imply that a perfect balance between 0 and infinity is actually at 1, which is something I am musing. Even its shape is a line indicating balance, just as infinity's shape ∞ is a curve that actually represents what infinity means, by connecting back to electromagnetic fields, and just as the shape of zero 0 suggests a point of origin. When nothing looks at itself, it sees everything.
RE: Matter and Antimatter: Reflections