It was a couple months or so back that I seen this article out on one of the blockchains that someone referenced off Slay News, "Scientists Develop New Method to Detect ‘Nanorobots’ in Covid-Vaxxed". Nanorobots in the covid vaccines has been a debate of interest among scientist for quite some time, some claiming conclusive proof they have been found in vaccinated individuals while others continually deny their existence. All I know conclusively at this point is that Dr. Peter McCullough and his associates did not find nanorobots in the covid vaxxed as the headline to this article claims. I read the study late that night and sat it aside to look more in-depth at it.
I totally forgot about it until a couple of weeks or so later when @value-customer posted up a mention of it in one of his postings. I meant to get back to it at that point but the ever fast changing news cycle kept me focused on what was happening and keeping up with that. One of those never take you eye off the ball of what's taking place behind the scenes, keeping you focused on what they want you to know, not on what they don't want you to know. First and foremost I think what gets lost on a lot of people is that individuals like McCullough, Katalin Kariko, Drew Weissman, Robert Malone and even Dr. Fauci, though intellectually intelligent people they are not of the class of individuals classified under "a beautiful mind". What Dr. McCullough and his associates did was find a better testing method other than quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing, most famously known as the PCR test. That test that even the inventor said wasn't an adequate determination testing mechanism. How McCullough and associates achieved that was similar in patent technologies developed by Charles Lieber, the only individual here worthy of the beautiful mind label. Nefarious minded, maybe, but none the less fully deserving of the label. Lieber's was once given an award for most outstanding scientific achievements over a decade period of time. All these other individuals were just the front page headlines that kept you from reading all the US government defense research Lieber's and his associates had done over the years financed by the US government. Charles Lieber was the one arrested in late Dec 2019 coming back into the US with claimed suitcase full of money from China. That was about the same period Robert Malone came running out onto the world stage with his wife announcing that he had been intellectually raped and he was the inventor of mRNA technology, which was conducted decades earlier involving a protein response by insertion into the cells by transfection that lasted a whole five minutes before the cell disintegrated. I always liken it to someone who stuck peanut butter into some chocolate but failed to make a perfect peanut butter cup. Kariko and Weissman, it took them years to figure out how to manipulate the immune response not to response to a foreign invader, that's why the vaccines have in it whatever it takes to switch up the immune response to tolerate a virus, not defend against it. Fauci, he was just an insider enabler go between. None of these individuals hold over fifty different patents and come no where near the genius Lieber's was. Lieber's, I believe if I remember correctly, as the USPTO website can't be accessed for me to look up the patent, used a zinc made wire that could extract information out of a cell. Information such as how healthy a cell was, how sick a cell was, how young, how old, or any number of reasons for research you would want to know extracted from it. His nano technology could transport fluids in and out of cells, even without a trace it was ever there. We know this to be true not just by the patent application it was spoken of, but what Noubar Afeyan, co-founder and chairman of Moderna had to say about mRNA technology: Noubar Afeyan explains the promise of messenger RNA by comparing it to the more controversial concept of changing an individuals DNA. He notes changes to the DNA can be essentially permanent, like hardware. By contrast messenger RNA is more like software: it can be used to perform a task and then can be programmed to disappear. It all hinges on coming up with the right transcription for what you are looking for. That's what McCullough and his associates accomplished. “Here, we present a simple and efficient COVID-19 detection assay with plasmonic-magnetic nanorobots through an electronic readout platform (see Scheme 1). “As a nanoscale building block of nanorobots, the Fe3O4/Au/Ag nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized by a sequential chemical reduction method. “Firstly, under 10 nm Au seeds were formed on the Fe3O4 NPs, which facilitates nucleation and growth of high-density Ag particles, leading to the hierarchically structured Fe3O4/Au/Ag NPs. “The nanorobots were readily fabricated by assembling Fe3O4/Au/Ag NPs into rod-shaped microaggregates, which enables controllable propulsion and navigation under the rotating magnetic field. Here's what the name of the study was: "Plasmonic-magnetic nanorobots for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection through electronic readout" <a href "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8818338/"> Here is a Lieber's version of that: The article of claim 1, further comprising: a substrate, It's not the only one, there's more patents on nano technologies with transcriptions to the objective trying to be meant half a sentence long, most the above individuals would have suffered a serious brain fart before figuring that all out. Kudos to McCullough and his team for having figured out a way to test for Sar Cov 2 in a more efficient manner than using PCR testing. This was done using cell samples from someone infected with Sar Cov 2, not a vaccinated individual. For all the articles attempt to cherry pick sentences and make it appear it was done with cells from a vaccinated individual, it fails miserable, even more miserably they found nanorobots in the cells rather than the use of nano technology in the cell to detect Sars Cov 2, and does harm to the accomplishment at hand. Someone seriously needs to ask why Slay felt they needed to tarnish the work in this fashion when in the exact same article they link to studies of individuals who found nanotechnologies in the vaccines. "Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study". <a href "https://mail.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/102". That was published in The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research. Is Slay just trying to sell headlines for the clicks, or hurt rather than help on the long journey to getting answers.
wherein the holding member is positioned on the substrate, and
wherein the non-carbon nanotube is supported on only one end by the holding member;
a first electrode in electrical communication with the non-carbon nanotube; and
a second electrode in electrical communication with the non-carbon nanotube.
"Nanoscale sensors for intracellular and other applications" <a href "https://patents.justia.com/patent/9638717">