Before diving into the technical details, let me be clear: Kubernetes is an extraordinary piece of technology. It represents the pinnacle of container orchestration, offering unparalleled scalability and resilience for large-scale applications. However, like an Olympic sport, it’s not something most people should attempt without years of training and a genuine need. As engineers, we must be pragmatic about our technology choices rather than following hype cycles.

🤯Understanding the Complexity

Have you ever watched Olympic gymnastics and thought, “I could do that with a few months of practice”? Yet many developers approach Kubernetes with exactly this level of naivety.

Kubernetes isn’t just another tool to add to your stack. It’s an entire platform with its own ecosystem, terminology, and operational paradigms. It’s nearly impossible to understand the entire K8s ecosystem — the more you learn, the more you discover it’s a never-ending well of technical information.

The complexity runs deep: pods, deployments, services, ingress controllers, persistent volumes, config maps, secrets, namespaces — and that’s barely scratching the surface. Each component comes with its own configuration options and potential pitfalls.

One developer candidly described their K8s learning experience:

“Most of my time is spent banging my head against the wall if something doesn’t work and I don’t know where to even start debugging it”.

Does this sound like a productive use of your development time when you’re simply trying to launch an application?

Remember when we used to deploy applications without orchestrating a symphony of containers? Those were simpler times, and for most applications, those simpler approaches still work perfectly well.

🧔🏾Why K8s Expertise Takes Years, Not Months

The Kubernetes learning curve “doesn’t necessarily need to be steep, it can be quite gentle. But it will definitely be long (and will actually never end)”. This isn’t like picking up a new JavaScript framework — it’s more akin to learning an entirely new profession.

One engineer shared:

“I got lucky because I started a new job, and they basically said ‘here’s your desk, bye!’ and gave me zero direction… so I basically just decided to get paid for 6 months to teach myself k8s”.

Six months of full-time work just to gain comfort with the basics!

Even certification doesn’t guarantee mastery. As one developer humorously noted:

“I’ve been using k8s for a year now and I am definitely not an expert. I got 86% on my cka which proves I know at least 86% of the ecosystem”. Knowing is different than knowing how.

The reality? Even certified professionals continually learn and face new challenges in the K8s landscape.

Think critically: Do you really have six months to a year to dedicate to learning deployment technology when you’re focused on building and launching a product?

🔢When Do You Actually Need Kubernetes? Hard Numbers and Metrics

Let’s be objective about when Kubernetes becomes a necessity rather than a luxury. Before diving into K8s, ask yourself:

1. Are you handling hundreds of thousands of daily active users?
2. Does your application require sophisticated horizontal scaling under variable loads?
3. Do you have a team of operations engineers dedicated to infrastructure?
4. Is your application architecture already organized into true microservices?
5. Do you have a mature CI/CD pipeline that could benefit from container orchestration?

If you answered “no” to most of these questions, Kubernetes is likely premature.

Consider this: Google operated at massive scale for years before developing the technology that would eventually become Kubernetes. They didn’t start with this complex orchestration system — they evolved to it as their scale demanded it.

At what point should you consider Kubernetes? When you’re consistently seeing:

📈More than 100,000 daily active users with rapidly growing traffic patterns

🏗️Deployment complexity that can’t be handled with simpler tools

🏢A team that includes at least 2–3 developers dedicated to operations

🖧Genuine need for resilience features like automatic failover and self-healing

Remember, premature optimization is the root of all evil in software development. Implementing K8s before you need it is like buying an 18-wheeler to deliver a single pizza.

Better Alternatives for Most Developers

🐳Docker Swarm: The Underrated Contender

Docker Swarm offers much of what developers initially want from Kubernetes, but with a fraction of the complexity. It provides container orchestration, service discovery, load balancing, and scaling capabilities that are sufficient for many applications.

Swarm’s key advantage is that it uses the same Docker API you’re already familiar with. If you can use Docker Compose, you can use Swarm with minimal additional learning. For startups and individual developers, this dramatically reduces the barrier to entry for containerized deployments.

Why struggle with the complexity of Kubernetes when a simpler tool might meet your needs? Sometimes the best technology choice isn’t the most complex one.

🌐Serverless Solutions: Maximum Output with Minimum Overhead

For many applications, particularly those with variable workloads, serverless architectures offer compelling advantages over container orchestration.

Platforms like Supabase provide “serverless functions that offer a powerful way to execute custom business logic on a globally distributed platform”. These functions scale automatically based on demand, require zero infrastructure management, and integrate seamlessly with databases and authentication systems.

With serverless, you focus entirely on your business logic while the platform handles scaling, availability, and infrastructure concerns. Isn’t that what we ultimately want from Kubernetes anyway?

On top of that, Supabase can be self-hosted, so you could host your Supabase instance on a powerful enough vertically scaled server before even considering Docker Swarm or K8s.

🖥️Simple VPS Solutions: More Than Enough for Most

Let’s be honest: for many applications, especially in their early stages, a simple VPS with Docker installed is more than sufficient. This setup can handle thousands of users with proper optimization and provides a straightforward path to scaling when necessary.

A single well-configured VPS can handle more traffic than most early-stage applications will ever see. When you need more capacity, horizontal scaling with a load balancer and multiple VPS instances is still far simpler than managing a Kubernetes cluster.

Have we forgotten that successful companies were built long before Kubernetes existed? Sometimes we overcomplicate solutions to problems we don’t actually have yet.

😈The Microservices Myth: A Necessary Evil, Not a Holy Grail

Kubernetes and microservices are often mentioned in the same breath, creating the impression that you can’t have one without the other. This leads many developers to prematurely decompose their monoliths in preparation for Kubernetes adoption.

But microservices come with significant coordination and operational costs. They’re a solution to specific organizational and technical scaling problems, not an architectural ideal to be pursued for its own sake.

“Containers are immutable and will allow the DoD to centrally accredit and harden containers… (think of a true gold disk concept but that actually scale and works)”.

For large organizations like the Department of Defense, the benefits clearly outweigh the costs. But does your startup operate at the scale and complexity of the Department of Defense?

Microservices should be viewed as a necessary evil for complex organizations, not a romanticized ideal for every application. Start with a well-structured monolith, and decompose into microservices only when specific parts genuinely benefit from independent scaling and deployment.

🤑The Marketing Versus Reality Gap

Kubernetes can indeed be used by organizations of various sizes, especially with managed services like EKS, GKE, and AKS. However, the question isn’t whether small organizations can use Kubernetes, but whether they should.

The marketing around Kubernetes often focuses on its capabilities without adequately addressing the operational costs and expertise required. Just because startups can set up Kubernetes doesn’t mean it’s the most efficient use of their limited resources.

“Do you really think Google release K8s out of the goodness of their hearts? Come on, grow up. They capitalize heavily on many parts of the ecosystem”. Open Source is the lure, the ecosystem is the trap.

Consider what Kyle Mathews states in his article:

“Kubernetes is the quintessential source of incidental complexity for our age, and our industry has been duped into believing that it is ‘good’.”

This “incidental complexity” represents overhead that most early-stage projects simply cannot afford.

Conclusion

Kubernetes is an impressive technology that solves real problems at scale. For organizations with the right needs and resources, it’s transformative.

According to Proxify:

“K8s has become one of the recommended systems for startups to run their distributed applications” — but note the emphasis on distributed applications, not every application.

On top of that, some startups will never grow big enough, some will disappear and some others will implode due to complexity in their systems. Again, K8s can accelerate your failure if you don’t need it and implement it wrongly (at the wrong time and space).

The reality is that K8s is an Olympic-level competition that most developers and applications will never need to participate in. There’s no shame in that — it’s simply acknowledging that different tools serve different purposes.

If you want to learn K8s because you want a sense of security when asked about it on an interview, be real. Tell the recruiter you’ve read about it, done basic experiments, watched hundreds of YouTube videos but let them know that unless the position is for a DevOps Engineer with 10 years of experience, you still have a long way to go to build familiarity with it.

Before jumping on the Kubernetes bandwagon, ask yourself: Do I actually need this complexity right now? Or am I being seduced by the allure of a technology that’s popular but misaligned with my current needs?

Remember that your goal is to build and deliver valuable software, not to accumulate the most complex tech stack. Sometimes, the simplest solution isn’t just adequate — it’s optimal.

You don’t need Kubernetes until you genuinely do. And by the time you truly need it, you’ll have the resources, experience, and team to implement it properly. Until then, focus on delivering value with tools that match your current scale and expertise. Your future self (and your users) will thank you.

---

If you liked this article I’d appreciate an upvote or a comment. That helps me improve the quality of my posts as well as getting to know more about you, my dear reader.

Muchas gracias!

Follow me for more content like this.

X | PeakD | Rumble | YouTube | Linked In | GitHub | PayPal.me | Medium

Down below you can find other ways to tip my work.

BankTransfer: "710969000019398639", // CLABE
BAT: "0x33CD7770d3235F97e5A8a96D5F21766DbB08c875",
ETH: "0x33CD7770d3235F97e5A8a96D5F21766DbB08c875",
BTC: "33xxUWU5kjcPk1Kr9ucn9tQXd2DbQ1b9tE",
ADA: "addr1q9l3y73e82hhwfr49eu0fkjw34w9s406wnln7rk9m4ky5fag8akgnwf3y4r2uzqf00rw0pvsucql0pqkzag5n450facq8vwr5e",
DOT: "1rRDzfMLPi88RixTeVc2beA5h2Q3z1K1Uk3kqqyej7nWPNf",
DOGE: "DRph8GEwGccvBWCe4wEQsWsTvQvsEH4QKH",
DAI: "0x33CD7770d3235F97e5A8a96D5F21766DbB08c875"