How is my question a misdirection ? Did I not answer your first question I this thread? I then asked a relevant question of you regarding Timothy and his being circumsized, which you brought up to prove that Paul was still Pro- circumcision. My comment and question regarding Timothy's life and timing of his circumcision are directly related to our conversation about Paul's understanding of circumcision. besides, when I ask a question, I support it and my line of reasoning with commentary. Please give me your line of reasoning why not being circumsized in the wilderness had any baring on thw question of Timothy's timing of his circumcision.
RE: Contending for the Faith: part 1 of ?