just because you repeatedly state that Paul did not think circumcision was necessary just not mean that the statement is true. That statement puts paw in a position to contradict what God Said. Your position creates a contradiction in the scriptures.
Why does Paul need to Circumcised Timothy to please these Jews? Wouldn't it pleased the Jews to circumcise all Gentiles as well?
Who am I kidding, why would I expect somebody who openly rebelled against God by not circumcising his own son's to understand the proper context of circumcision being spoken of in the New Testament.
RE: Contending for the Faith: part 1 of ?