While I don't disagree with the premise of the this and the proposal. I was actually for this before the last proposal that already pushed a lot of the reward to the top end. You say people who play in silver see all the accounts with lv 1 cards and I do play in silver after the rest and depending days before I am stable in gold. I see more max level cards for silver than I do lv 1 anymore though the lv 1 are still there.
I only joined in Feb and already gave up on level untamed cards because it's 15 - 30K for silver / gold level. As you say even if people combine cards to level 3 which isn't even a max silver deck for the most part, how do we stop the cost of entry moving forward where isn't 50 - 100K just for lv 3 cards? I know the first thing people will say is renting and scholar but people want to own their own stuff.
You say it good for the future of the economy but when people can't afford to join the economy we're left with just people that are here and burn out will happen... which may allow new players to get in cheaper but not by much.
RE: Thoughts on the Latest SPS Governance Proposal