Thank you for submitting both of your recent proposals. I fully support the other one, and I do support the principle behind this one.
However, I do have what may be a niche question about the interpretation of what constitutes a battle helper. Particularly the adaptation from Magic the gathering as games occurring "between two players. Not a player vs another player and their friend"
Would you consider sitting side by side with another human (say a friend, or child, niece/nephew, significant other, etc.), and working together using nothing other than your own brains in real-time as enlisting a battle helper?
I would interpret the Magic the Gathering clarification above as ruling that practice against the terms of service. I don't believe that this is the intent behind getting rid of battle-helpers
(Please correct me if I'm wrong).
I think we should want Splinterlands to be something that friends/family/etc would participate in together, and if this is prohibited under new terms of service, I think is would be a potential unintended consequence.
Maybe I'm too far into the weeds on this, but I think it's at least worth considering.
Thank you for your hard work.
RE: SPS Governance Proposal: Update Terms Of Service To Prohibit Use Of Battle Helpers in Modern Ranked, Tourneys, and Brawls