I agree this might squeeze out some players, particularly because we have such a binary culture here. Instead of people looking to "give and take" on issues to solve them, we instead fight to the death on each and every issue.
So the question is will people compromise to solve problems that the other side has? In my case, its yes, but in most cases its no.
I am willing to accept a lower rate than the 1 DEC minimum per day, to be 1 DEC minimum per season. NOTE: that is cheaper than people have now on a per day basis.
But it doesn't seem like anyone wants to budge and actually solve the issue I have (even though I'm willing to address their concern). And that applies to most everyone on each issue they have. So no matter which way this goes we will squeeze out players. Whether its small vs large, established vs new, or human vs bot; I don't think until we actually start discussing things and finding solutions in a non-binary way then we will continue to lose players.
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Make Rentals Seasonal Only