I think you are missing a point here. Morality of a group is something subjective. You assume that violence cannot be moral. Well, it can be. It depends on how you define it.
The reason you cannot debate properly with statists is for the same reason you post your version of the Spock up there and I am posting my version of the Spock down here (without saying that I agree with the statement).
I do agree with your philosophy, I adhere to anarchic and capitalistic principles myself, but your approach will come off as ignorant because you assume that ethics is something universal. Ethics are shaped by the environment. What is ethical for you is not for another. What was "moral" 200 years ago, its not today.
In the future don't be suprised some future nerds caling us "statists of the blockchain" because we allowed being sheep in Steemit while the whales had all of the wealth, deciding what content will be displayed.
RE: Principles and Predictions