Good day to all.
Received SBD or STEEM from this post will be shared between the posts that have fallen into the ranking among the authors who upvote this post
I present you the rating of users who successfully called my bot.
Reminder: You can get a free UpVote from me. For this it is enough to subscribe to me @djimirji and in the comments to my post specify text @djimirji up!
I will clarify the formula of the rating a little, I would like to upgrade it somehow, maybe you will have suggestions on how to do this.
Now I analyze 4 components:
| Parameter | Influence of % |
|---|---|
| Comments | 16 |
| The length of the post (the number of characters) | 18 |
| Number of rshares received not from bots | 50 |
| Author reputation | 16 |
It is clear that we can not eliminate all the bots that voted, but I think there is not a big error here.
| № | Author | Post | Parrots ) | Upvote % | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  @voltash | ""The chief pilgrim" Najot Kanash | 0.17503 | 0 | 0.000 SBD |
| 2 | @voltash | Massimo Bottura is an Italian innovator and chef of Osteria Francescana. | 0.10739 | 0 | 0.000 SBD |
| 3 |  @andrewby | 8 reasons why an honors pupil at school is not an excellent student in life | 0.07613 | 100 | 0.001 SBD |
The post from which take the reward Rating of the posts who called djimirji. Period 24.6.2018-26.6.2018.
Total reward gained by post: 0.006 SBD
Total shared reward: 0.001 SBD
During the period from 2 July 2018 to 4 July 2018 the bot voted for 22 posts.
The rating includes 7% of posts for the period, but not less than 3 posts.
I would like to hear from you, what parameters and how much in your opinion they should influence the rating. All the same, getting the robot to determine the quality of content is not an easy task.
@originalworks