Everyone seems complimentary about Dan. I've put 10 BTC into this and, in some ways wish it hadn't been created as it's been ill conceived in terms of fairness from day one. I have, for the last 8 months, hoped all the obvious fairness issues could have been ironed out. Perhaps change can now be bought about much quicker without Dan
People seem to be all complimentary about Dan but why build a ship, only to be the first to abandon it as it takes on water. There are a lot of clever people in the world who don't have leadership skills but still want control of their baby. Dan is no Steve Jobs or Bill Gates.
Looking at his track record and what he says, he seems like a dreamer with his so called vision for world peace etc. However, he can't even seem to get along with colleagues so looks to less immediate connections to try to have meaning.
It seems like there has been an underlying conflict at head office for some time.
Perhaps, Steem Inc can get on with saving the ship without the precious ownership issues and control Dan felt he deserved. I, for one, am optimistic this could be the start of a clean slate for Steem and we can move ahead.