I want to make a proposal to Steemit developers to make it a rule that you can only vote on the same authors a maximum of 4-5 times per week to help curate new authors, so people are not just voting on the same authors every day. This will give new authors a chance to stand out and it will make curators look for new good content so they are not just following only the top earners in the Steemit statistics. Right now we have a system where people are only following the top earners and only voting on the same exact authors every day, why not give new authors a chance to stand out?
If you curate a new author who has not earned very much yet and they end up in the top pages of Steemit your reward should be higher then if you just curated someone who is in the top pages daily.
If we create an atmosphere that only rewards the same authors every day and excludes new content creators is this really good for the platform? When I first joined Steemit everyone was curating new users not just a few people who have been the top earners for a long time. I feel sad 
that we are turning this into a platform of only follow the top earners and up vote on the same people everyday and exclude new users kind of club. If this turns into a club where we only curate the same authors every day I have a feeling this site won't last to see the glory days of Facebook and Twitter. I am not saying to up vote crap but that we need to include everyone into the platform not just the top earners. Don't you want to see the platform grow big like Facebook? If we welcome new users the platform will be better for it and grow bigger and stronger.
#steemit #idea #proposal #upvote #steem
