I'll take your word for the connection problem - even though I did resfresh numerous times -
Why would you allow a user to accidentally set the chance so high that they cannot win and is always a win win - obviouisly it was an error placing a wager if 99.99% -
Why do some say invalid amount when too small but when too big steemdice takes the .002 SBD?
Why when user places a wager too large it says invalid but too small it shows nothing and the user is left guessing what the wager was.
I appreciate you answering those questions -
Now can you provide large scale actual samples of the %of a number coming out in a group of 5,000 rolls?
Because every sample I have analyzed the numbers do just not add up - I have a degree in Actuarial Science and understand statistics better than most of the planet however something still does not appear to jive - what is the margin of error for hypothetically rolling 60 5,000 times in a row - how many times Wii the number be be 60 or below for example?
Do you agree that the larger the sample the closer to 60% should be the result by the basic principles of statistics -
Can you explain why certain numbers - I.e. Closer to 0 - like 10 or 30 have a larger deviation than higher numbers?
If you can explain that so it makes sense to provable fair I will personal help promote your site all over the place and mention it as an A+++ site in every comment and post I ever write again -
Is It righteous to not respond to me and hurt a minnows posts and following because I had called out the website as not probably fair ? Is that the STEEMIT way? I put a lot of work and effort and donated money to your cause simply to help prove my case.
How many people would waste almost $45-50 with an account valued at $98? To try and help the community?
RE: An Actuary decides to assign a cryptography/cryptocurrency based project to interns