The members you call into question are real and different people, and arguing that "account creation" gives some sort of link to identity is a misnomer: account creation can be used to make an account for a friend without knowing the private key associated with the new account.
thats a gross misinterpretation of what i said.
Secondly, there is no express rule about having multiple accounts. Clayop below questions the identity of @aizensou and accounts they are connected to, but this is not a reason to witch-hunt them.
A point which i made in reply to him
I encourage you to read our guide on Identity, here, and give up the attempts at witch-hunting members of our community.
to my mind, your verification proves nothing. You have a conflict of interest. A behind closed doors verifiation by an organization that is the beneficiary of donations and support from the individual being verified (or from the individual being distinguished form the individual being identified) is not meaningful evidence, IMO.
I don't really care about your guide to identity verification. because this post has nothing to do with that. This post is about exposing facts about how the reward pool is allocated and about the links a controversial user has with his largest supporter, not verifying someones identity.
What youre attempting to do is supress facts and information that people can use to make an informed decision, not a witch hunt.
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)