Not so far (Sunday night) I have met SteemNova
(here, on Steemit - one of the posts of my new friend)
Everybody who don't know what is it:
Tactical-strategic browser online game (most of all text-oriented) - can join to see => steemnova.intinte.org
So, after s couple of days of my reaseach here, on Steemit, and in the statistics-alliances inside my interpretation of the game is looks like this:
Guys, if you are really wanna to expand the game - so you must sit at the negotiating table. And reach the consensus.
Ok, you "do not delete such marks inside the game - like this name of alliance and the description - because, oh, you so tolerant & democratic". Yes. But it's spoils the impression and does not inspire confidence.
Ok, so be this text - but you must to add to the tutorial some explanations about this.
In common sense, like: "This is beta version, we still develop the game, and not of all are happy abou the changes" or smth like you know what and how to explain.
Because (look at the picture again) it is a quite big shock to see THIS inside.
And see the @marsell comments under the posts of Steemnova.
Also I wanna an explanation of this news:
"Steemnova, Oh dare two players are one step closer to creating the Death Star!" from @mawit07
It is near aobut admins cheating, isn't it?
If both guys did not tell him about this - the proof of the broken intimacy of 2 strategists.
P.S. All others who still wanna try this game - against marsells' warnings - => steemnova.intinte.org