Hello steemians !
This is my first article, I am just a beginner who is not even perfect in stringing words, hopefully with your blessing in understanding my writing, I can become a famous writer.
Before I was not a special expert in any field, I was just an ordinary civilian and only a high school student who wanted to try to uncover some facts or some logic exactly, which might not have occurred to you at all.
I am sure it will be easy for you to analyze some of the arguments from me, because here I only carry the basic material is not concerned with numbers, puzzles and formulas that you have to work hard to understand and even I am sure what I will discuss already learned in school upper middle.
Before entering my argument, here I am affirming this is not an absolute truth you must believe and you are faithful because whatever I write is merely an opinion and argument that only comes from the ordinary high school student's mind that never even gains satisfactory learning outcomes , and I do not blame anybody or justify it, because right and wrong it is only you who can determine it.
Okay steemians, straight to the point here I will discuss some odd arguments in my opinion, remember only odd does not mean wrong, you know what is GRAVITY?
In the physics of gravity defines,
"The tensile force that occurs between all the particles that have mass in the universe".
Just as with the earth that has a very large mass produces an enormous force of gravity to attract objects around it, including living things, and objects on earth, I believe that's what you learned from the moment you set foot in school basic, so easy, we just go to the argument.
The origin of the law of gravity
The formulation of the newton law and the laws of archimedes
James Prescott Joule the Eternal Energy Formulator
The cause of the motion of the revolution
The law or just the theory of gravity?
Here's the explanation !
THE ORIGIN OF THE LAW OF GRAVITY LAW
Isaac Newton Lincolnshire, 14 jaunuari 1643 - Kensington March 31, 1727 at the age of 84, he breathed his last breath, and in Newton's life he had said that it fell due to the gravitational power of "gravity that pulled him down" Newton saw an apple fall from his apple tree in 1665 and simply said it because of the force of gravity, but you know what? in fact Isaac Newton himself was dissatisfied with the explanation because it should have moved if it was driven not withdrawn, so what actually pushed all the objects to earth? and Newton could only raise his hands and say "I do not know, and I made up with something called gravitational pull" so it is not natural that ordinary people can answer this and even the inventor alone is unable to explain how gravity works.
LEGAL FORMATION NEWTON AND ARCHIMEDES
Archimedes is an inventor and mathematician from Greece who is famous as the inventor of hydrostatics or often called the law of archimedes, following the sound of the law,
"If an object is immersed in a liquid, then it gets a force called buoyant force (upward force) of the weight of the liquid it displaces"
Archimedes imposed the law on water, what if the water medium is replaced by air? does it make sense? of course because the air and water are the same natural elements, the short question from me, what makes the iron sink if the water as its medium? of course nothing other than the iron type mass is heavier than the density of the water type, right? what makes wood floating in the water? of course because the density of wood is lighter than water, right? what makes a balloon filled with helium gas can fly in the air? of course because the helium gas type is lighter than air, right? and the last question what makes the object fall from the top down if the medium is air? I know you will definitely answer that because of gravity? and where is the logic? is the answer to gravity worthy of being the right answer? all I give back to you, remember! right and wrong it is only in you.
JAMES PRESCOTT JOULE THE ETERNAL ENERGY FORMULATOR
Back to the gravitational cause, the earth is described as a large magnetic field that essentially has the south pole and its north pole, in the sense that the earth has a tensile force and a thrust like a magnet. Do you know what James Joule has explained before? The following sounds the law of conservation of energy.
"Energy can not be created or destroyed"
It's easy, a genius like Einstein knows exactly that the earth can not have a pulling force, because he understands the law of polarity, if there is a positive there must be a negative and if there is a force of attraction there is a repulsive force, Einstein fully understand the law of conservation of energy, can not be created or destroyed and can only change shape, if the earth has the energy to pull an object, its energy go where? this theory does not make sense to Einstein. A simple example is a balloon blown with energy supplied by the lungs, the balloon can not expand if the air in the lung is not transferred to the balloon. And also can be exemplified by a magnet that has a tensile force and force thrust, continue where the logic if the gravity only has a tensile force alone, where the force thrust? will this Newton law be in conflict with the law of conservation of energy advanced by joules or vice versa? the wrong and true answer only to yourself.
CAUSE OF REVOLUTION MOVEMENT
Is the motion of the earth's revolution occurring because the gravitational force generated by the sun is greater than the earth? so the earth surrounds the sun, then why spin? why did not the earth fall into the sun as it did with Newton's apple? is this wrong? or are we still too ignorant in understanding it?
I am going to tell the story a few hundred years ago, the theory of earth around the sun begins with a person named Copernicus the sun worshiper, Copernicus is a fanatic of his own stream even he to theorize that the earth and all other celestial bodies orbit the sun, he formulated this only because of his interest with the sun even menuhankannya, after that the theory was continued by Galileo with his heliosentrik theory, even I am sure that you know for sure Galileo sentenced to death for having published the absolute truth that the earth around the sun, but it turns out it is a big lie that is repeated and made as if it really happened, because by repeating the lie it would be easy for the listener to believe it rather than convince the listener that this is a truth.
Galileo was actually sentenced to death for not being able to prove his theory with "stellar paralax" or please click on the following link for further explanation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_parallax
LAW OR ONLY ON THE GRAVITY OF THE GRAVITY?
The law is an absolute thing that is not a myth or hypothesis that can be inviolable because it is accompanied by a variety of facts and logic and in no way conflict with nature and power that has been determined by God Almighty.
While the theory is only an uncertain determination because the theory does not have enough arguments or facts to convince the public. And this theory is usually only limited to be studied and researched not to be trusted.
So if you now ask whether gravity is a law or just a theory, and that answer is only you who can answer it, will gravity be worthy of being called a law with many other natural laws that contradict it? True and false only you can determine and I am just ordinary human and have no special expertise in any field.
So, Asyraf Muza may be useful for you.