A science of wonder puts emphasis on questions rather than answers as opposed to a science of certainty which is all about answers; are answers really more useful than questions? I think the steemSTEM community could benefit from a science of wonder and living with a good question (and the tension it brings) rather than answering it and storing it in a box to never look at it again.
Ref. https://www.endlesssearch.co.uk/science_cosmicreligion.htm
https://press.princeton.edu/titles/9406.html
RE: To steemstem or not to steemstem: Who defines science?