Every person is at least 75% responsible for how others treated him. Our verbal and abusive actions limit or extend the choices of others. For example, if a person asks "How are you"? As long as it moves, you know better than to roam and to walk with them to give a better answer. By continuing to walk in the past, the person indicates that only an approval or a brief answer is expected. However, if that person stopped you from asking the same question and looked in the eye, then your choices have changed their behavior has invited more than a reactive answer.
We are all creatures of habit, and the communication system helps us to avoid thinking about everything we say. But when we only slip into the pattern because we have failed to develop other response options, then we can get forecasts. If you are known for the tendency to avoid conflicts, for example, the situation of others may arise that you can pull back, apologize, or walk. You give up part of your 75% responsibility. This is not good!
But if we have a list of answers and we have a return on our fingers, then we can opt for the guessable patterns. For example, taking some rude questions as objective questions, finding some element of reasoning in a ridiculous comment, or answering insults as it was casual, it is possible to learn. In this way, instead of suffering from habitual patterns, we become mediator that what happens to us
Such skills are especially important in the harsh political environment, where it is said that often it does not mean what it means. A political degree requires a degree of road gap to survive and flourish. It is important to know the effective ways to react to difficult situations
What if someone tells you one thing, but then you hear that he has done something different from others? It is not uncommon in highly political organizations, should you pass it? Contribution to enmity? Do not trust that person again? Know the situation directly? With the reactions of responses, you have the options. You may be able to prevent such situation in the future by choosing an effective response immediately after the initial crime - a reaction that requires the attacker to think again the next time. Whether you are new to pulling your recurring show or to an experienced hand, it is useful for various reactions available easily. The following "R-List" of classified strategies can help you. When a potential negative situation has to be answered, the facility can help an important relationship with them to avoid the loss or to eliminate the danger for your reliability:
Reframe - Cast the problem in a different light Tell another person's words or actions in such a way that there is a future conversation. If someone says, "I do not want to fight about this," there is a useful romp of that comment, "This is a debate, definitely there is no fight and you are a good debate, as I remember."
Refresh - Say words in a different, less negative way, if someone has accused you of coming to a meeting very firmly, you can reply, "I was passionate." If you are described as strenuous, you might say, "when something important is needed to make a successful effort." Instead of passing the wrong or offensive words, suggest replacement
Review again - Use the first breakthrough to redefine an existing failure. If there are past history of positive relations of people involved in the conversation, then they can help to remind them of their previous success and their potential to find common ground: "We have a good track record of working together now. there is no reason. "
Reframe - Clear or redo negative words Anyone can unknowingly commit a crime or spark disagreement. In such a time, one of my favorite strategies is useful to work: Give them the opportunity to do the right thing. "Surely there is another way to say" or "Did you mean I think I've heard?" There are useful ways to encourage a person to encourage that which was said.
Request - Ask a question when a person's intentions are skeptical, then a sensible approach is to check their perceptions by interrogating them before reacting to negative: "Would you make clear to me that you only want to Are you? "
Rebellions - Adjust the power of another person People give unnecessary power when they make someone sad or weaken their work. Often, such a power imbalance can be changed. In a way, with your attitude, you have to reduce the effect - refuse to be bothered - or saying, "Fortunately, I am not easily offended, especially with one-of-a-kind situations."
Reorganisation - Change the priority of the issues by focusing on the process to keep away from personal concerns. For example, one can be recursive, "we agree with that, but its like having some difficulty with the how.” In this way, you cut the problem in half. The focus is now on only one aspect of what might otherwise appear to be an intractable impasse.
Conclusion
Versatility separates effective communicators from those who push and push through conversations - and life. The next time you have to face, you see a roadblock, whether because of guilt or delusion, consider the types to come up. For at least 75% of the way we are treating is the only way to become responsible. Otherwise, we are trapped in the rush for most of the day, are being expected, and are nowhere to be found. There is no fun or profit in it.
Like this article? Upvote and Resteem