The threshold for removal...
Chat with friends today,
I made my opinion,
I think the threshold should be the supporter of removal> the number of support when elected,
For example, when he was elected, the number of votes was 1 million, and the consent ticket for the hegemony of removal should be >1 million.
The result for my friend said:
Take one country as an example.
initial threshold for removal was majority decision.
Later, it was changed to a quarter-final, that is, a quarter of the voters voted for the removal, and they were successful.
This 1/4 decision = 25%, I am very surprised, if the voter turnout rate is 60%,
If the number of votes for the removal is 25%, the number of votes against the no removal will be 35%.
The result is a successful removal.
Because the recall ticket reached 25%, but the opponents have 35%,
Didn't it become a minority victory?
It’s a weird system,
minority victories = majority respects minority.
罷免的門檻...
今天和朋友聊天,
我提出了我的見解,
我認為門檻應該是贊成者>當選時的支持數,
比如他當選的時候,得票數是100萬,那霸免的同意票就該是>100萬.
結果朋友說:
以某個國家為例,
一開始的罷免是多數決,也就是罷免案,在投票的時候,贊成票>反對票.
後來改成了1/4決,也就是1/4的選民在罷免案之投票的時候,贊成罷免,就算成功了.
這1/4決=25%,讓我非常的訝異,那如果投票率是60%的時候,
若贊成罷免的票數為25%,那反對罷免的票數便為35%,
結果是罷免成功,
因為罷免票達到了25%,但反對者有35%啊,
豈不是變成了少數勝利.
真是奇怪的制度,
少數勝利,
還真的是多數尊重少數.