In a world where code is law, you have to have safety measures in place to audit and review the code and ensure it is good and also safe.
Several witnesses are saying they fear rejecting code and losing votes.
Although I acknowledge it is true, I also have zero respect for that position. In addition, it means there is no way to protect the chain from bad code either by accident or hacked code slipped in by bad actors.
Basically it says, I do not take my responsibilities seriously, I know I can't do the job, but I am going to accept money for it anyway.
While I acknowledge we survived the hardfork, my confidence in the system is bruised. I am not sure how to trust the system going forward.
I'm still processing, I don't take issue with new technology breaking, and I believe that the team is dedicated to fix what is broken.
Not making any rash decisions, but once in a while you have to acknowledge weak points in the system.
Please don't feel like you have to vote to comment... Let's hear your thoughts.