i don't like the 10 point scoring system for UFC. I dont have an answer to how it should be, but i know that the 10 point system can be improved.
In grappling you could dominate the whole round in offense, or you can be a complete shut down using strong defense. Who wins? in the judge's eyes, its the person who was more aggressive. But should that really be the case? or should it be the one who has the best technique and application?
You would need special judges specifically for those types of bouts. and it would easier to judge if you split the fighting styles up.
RE: UFC in war over fair Salaries