As many who are regular readers of this blog will know I’ve known some very decent, courteous and undemanding transvestites and transsexuals in my life. I’ve encountered many men (and it is mostly men) who either were the genuine sub 0.25% of the population who hated their own bodies or men who just liked to put on frocks and camp it up a bit and in this category of transvestites they could be either straight, gay or bi. A lot of these transsexuals often seemed to carry immense psychological burdens that manifested themselves in hating their own bodies to the extent that they gave informed consent, after a great deal of psychological work, to surgical and pharmaceutical changes to give themselves the simulacrum of the body that they thought they should have. I’m still not totally sure how many of this category are individuals for whom the gender issues are masking some other condition? This is because a majority of the transsexuals I’ve known have had other underlying sadnesses not just the gender identity issues.
As for the transvestites I have met, most seemed to dress up for the sheer joy of dressing up, sometimes I met those who cross dressed because of some deep seated psychological flaw and others because they were closet bisexuals and cross dressing was their way of giving ‘permission’ to themselves to engage in intimate relations with other men and some because cross dressing was their particular sexual kink. Some men might have a penchant or a kink for, to give but one example, muscular ginger haired women and there are some men who like dressing as muscular ginger haired women.
Maybe I’ve been lucky and I’ve mostly met only the mostly relatively decent transsexuals and transvestites in my personal, professional and voluntary service life but the rise of the ‘Transgender’ movement over the last couple of decades has been, even for me, someone who is liberal minded on these matters, a bit of an eye opener. Too much of the ‘trans’ movement I’ve come to see is made up not just of men but of the worst types of men. They are the men who feel that they are entitled to something even when they clearly are not, the men who refuse to hear the word ‘no’ when uttered to them by a woman and the men who have no respect for the boundaries of others and in particular the boundaries of women. These are the sort of men who are dangerous and worryingly, they are too often the public face of the transgender movement.
These are the men, the terrible, selfish and cruel men with the mad eyes of the sort often seen on the faces of zealots who in other circumstances would, for example, be gleefully chucking dissidents on trains bound for Gulags in the old Soviet Union, who the public have been presented with as representatives of the transgender movement and it’s terrifying. What’s even more terrifying is that these men who are too often the worst of men, have been given power and authority over others and especially over women and children, by successive British governments and an administrative system that refused to see the downsides of allowing men, any men, even the worst, to identify as women.
A governmental and administrative system that wasn’t imaginative enough to see the downsides of what became a cult of transgenderism and which listened at one point uncritically to its activists, has wreaked havoc on women and children and society as a whole. The state swearing allegiance to the priests of an ideology that preaches gender fluidity and the abolishing of the sex binary along with treating sex and gender as a claimable identity has resulted in mutilated children, frightened and rightfully angry women, dishonesty in journalism and the treatment of lies, about sex, as facts in our criminal and civil court system. The choice of the state to say ‘ok then’ to all men, including the worst, to self identify as women has politically corrupted our police forces, our prison system, social work, the Civil Service, the courts and the judiciary, the media and much much more.
How did we get here? How did we get to a situation where the worst of men could gain so much influence on our society and how did we end up with a culture where pointing out what was wrong with an ideology, that of transgenderism, got the lives of those who dissented from it ruined? Everyone has their own take on the history of the beliefs behind transgenderism and certain parts of it are better known than others and reach back to some quite dark times in geography and history which includes the German Weimar Republic and Nazi Germany. But what I saw of the first shoots of the transgender movement when it reached out into government and civil society were that this was done by trans activists who could be described as the reasonable ones, the trans types who didn’t frighten the horses. They didn’t seem that different from the decent and respectful transsexuals who I’d met earlier in life. I couldn’t see a reason why a tiny number of people who were unfortunately born the way they were and had had to have horrifically complex surgery and go on lifelong medication to cure their psychological ills, should be discriminated against. It was only later when I looked into the, sometimes very negative, long term outcomes for gender reassignment and the increasing worry that gender identity disorders might be masking some underlying undisclosed or unexplored condition, that I started to question what I understood about transsexualism. I came to the conclusion that transition might not be the cure for the ill that a person was ultimately suffering from and that for many transition would be either useless or counterproductive.
But opening the cracks in the very necessary sex barrier that exists between men and women in certain environments and activities didn’t just assist the decent people, the transsexuals who would never presume to push their luck and demand access to sex restricted places and who lived quietly and unobtrusively. Blurring the lines between sex and self ascribed gender might have helped a few people who might have been no trouble to society or to women or children, but it also assisted and enabled some of the very worst type of men that I mentioned earlier.
The cracks in the sex wall that were opened by the Gender Recognition Act for what may have been expected to be a tiny number of, mostly men, who had been extensively and as best as was possible psychologically examined prior to surgical and medical transition, turned into a flood of male wrong’uns into women’s spaces and via media and the education system, into the minds of our children. Nowhere was safe from these men who have no boundaries and the moral compass of a rapist. These aggressive men in dresses, who I need to say were a universe away from the sort of transsexuals and transvestites I’d encountered earlier in my life, bullied, threatened and used lawfare to force themselves into women’s sports, rape crisis centres, women’s refuges, stillbirth and miscarriage groups and much much more. It’s resulted in male police officers who LARP as women searching female detainees, male rapists housed on the female prison estate, women being robbed of the prizes due to them and in some cases has resulted in trans identified males speaking in place of women in ostensibly female centred organisations.
As for what the cult of trans and what it has done to children and young people then ‘unspeakable’ would be the best euphemism here. It’s done immense damage to those who have got caught up I the cult, damage that might never be able to be repaired and mentally and politically deranged those who are, or consider themselves to be, allies to this cult.
The recent demonstrations by trans rights activists following the Supreme Court ruling has ripped off all the veils that the trans rights movement had put up in front of their ideology to try to protect it from challenge. From what I have seen of the footage from the trans rights demonstrations in London and Worcester and accounts of them that I have read, it was a shitshow of monstrous proportions. All that is awful about the trans rights movement was on display here. We had the men with no respect for boundaries, the misogynist men, the men who believe that they are entitled to women’s spaces and services, the men you don’t want your children to be anywhere near and the men who would treat your wife as a ‘cervix haver’ and not a woman. These trans rights activists showed the public exactly who they are by vandalising the Churchill and the Millicent Fawcett statues and allegedly holding a public ‘pissing protest’, something that some trans activists have become notorious for. They carried placards that were so full of incitement to violence that I believe they may have crossed the criminal threshold and would certainly have been arrestable had they been carried not by a trans activist but a normal person who aimed similar sorts of incitement at a member of a community or a cause favoured by the governing and administrative classes.
The vast majority of natal males in these demonstrations were joined by mentally and physically mutilated women so deep in the cult of gender identity that I have little hope for their future sanity and health. There was also the socialists, ‘Palestine’ freaks and omnicause types there in spades and of course the women and men who have done the worst thing you can possibly do to a child and that is subject them to gender woo woo and it’s almost inevitable future and tragic failure.
What we saw on the streets of London, Worcester and elsewhere is the true face of the trans movement, including the men in dresses who think that pissing in public will help their cause. The trans movement might have initially sold their cause to us by showing us that Brenda (formerly Bill) from Accounts (invoice chasing) were normal in everything apart from one way but below the ‘decents’ there is a whole host of mostly men but some women who are everything that society should worry about.
The Supreme Court judgement does not remove any existing rights from genuine transsexuals and they are free to set up their own transsexual specific organisations for issues such as domestic violence, sexual assault and relationship, substance abuse and healthcare matters, but they cannot use or take over those services and organisations set up for and by women. It also doesn’t remove rights from the average transvestite who is still free to dance around their handbags in specialist clubs or be intimate with who they choose whether they be Gay Straight or Bi. This judgment protects the rights of women and it is not, as the trans rights activists say, an attack on those who call themselves trans. That the trans rights activists who have demonstrated in London and Worcester etc. don’t seem to understand or accept this fact and because they have kicked off so extremely about it, including with criminal damage, says to the public a whole lot about why the trans rights activists are not on the ‘right side of history’.
What we saw was the worst of the worst of the trans movement on the streets of British cities but that worst of the worst has for years been part of a ‘community’ that has tolerated them and sometimes lauded them. We can all see now what the trans community is and it is too often as politically, socially and culturally as malodorous as it looks, they have pissed on what is left of their public reputation as well as allegedly pissing on the streets in what is I have to say a very male fashion.